Defoe 130K a week

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Frenchie Facto

New member
May 17, 2017
6
France
And Bournemouth aren't stopping there.
Diony from Dijon at 120K a week
And more in the pipeline.

They must have more money than Chelsea and Man City combined.
 




A mex eyecan

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2011
3,875
And Bournemouth aren't stopping there.
Diony from Dijon at 120K a week
And more in the pipeline.

They must have more money than Chelsea and Man City combined.

how, just how can they do this?, what's their gate? pretty small, can't see tens of thousands of replica shirts being sold so how do they balance the books with FFP?
 










Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
Fcking plucky turds. Bournemouth annoy me almost as much as the Nigels.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 


bhanutz

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2005
5,999
And Bournemouth aren't stopping there.
Diony from Dijon at 120K a week
And more in the pipeline.

They must have more money than Chelsea and Man City combined.

You have it all wrong surely....This is 'Plucky little' Bournemouth we are talking about.. Eddie Howe is working miracles on a 'Shoe-string' budget!
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
They will build and fill a 50,000 all seater before we know it..
 












Husty

Mooderator
Oct 18, 2008
11,998
£130k a week is £20m in three years. If Bournemouth had bought someone for £10m and paid him £65k a week would anyone have even noticed? Yet it's the same outlay.

Like it or not, £6.5m a year for a goalscorer is loose change for any team that has had three seasons of EPL money. In fact it's cheap. I'm no fan of Bournemouth but this is undoubtedly a good deal for them financially.

You assume he doesn't have a £20mil signing on fee...
 


afcb

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2007
400
You have it all wrong surely....This is 'Plucky little' Bournemouth we are talking about.. Eddie Howe is working miracles on a 'Shoe-string' budget!

Never heard that since the embargo days, we do however have one of the lowest wage structures in the Premier league.

You lot need to get with this money business or you'll either do a Boro or have a coronary when you do splash out :lolol:
 




bhanutz

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2005
5,999
Never heard that since the embargo days, we do however have one of the lowest wage structures in the Premier league.

You lot need to get with this money business or you'll either do a Boro or have a coronary when you do splash out :lolol:

130k a week for a 35 yr old and a 3 yr contract......Oh ok then!
 




afcb

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2007
400
130k a week for a 35 yr old and a 3 yr contract......Oh ok then!

You seriously think we'd almost doubled his wages from Sunderland ?

I'd wager £65K as reported by the Telegraph and Sky..he'll have his relegation clause and we will have the 2 year clause...signing on fee -none of us have a scooby.
 








Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,955
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
£130k a week is £20m in three years. If Bournemouth had bought someone for £10m and paid him £65k a week would anyone have even noticed? Yet it's the same outlay.

Like it or not, £6.5m a year for a goalscorer is loose change for any team that has had three seasons of EPL money. In fact it's cheap. I'm no fan of Bournemouth but this is undoubtedly a good deal for them financially.

It's dead money though is the issue really, won't see a penny of it back. And that's if Defoe is lucky enough not to get a major injury at his age...
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top