Ninja Elephant
Doctor Elephant
- Feb 16, 2009
- 18,855
We had a good manager, he left. Since then we have lost another good manager, who left and appointed an average one, who has now left.
Since he has arrived we have sold our best players and we are now sitting in the bottom three of the Championship. When he arrived we had a play off challenging squad, we now have a bottom three in the championship side.
He is the CEO, he has to take some responsibility for what has happened.
Before Paul Barber arrived, we spent what we wanted to. When he arrived, the budget was underpinned by Tony Bloom, the landscape of finances in football was completely different. Bloom was funding the squad that we had built, and he was funding the dream under Gus Poyet.
Then FFP was voted in, and we needed someone to come in and get our house in order. I'm not going to bother going back in time, but there were threads on NSC about the over-spending of pretty much every function of the club. The job of Paul Barber was never going to be a popular one. He had to start making the club run properly and professionally, and start doing all the things fans don't want to hear about. He had to grow revenue streams, reduce operational losses and generally cut the wastage around the club. Obviously that won't be popular with the fans, but he wasn't hired to be popular.
Do you disbelieve Tony Bloom when he says that the playing budget has increased year on year, or at least stayed the same?
Do you believe the club shouldn't be run professionally and we shouldn't be so concerned about being financially sustainable?