Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Dean Hammond









Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,352
Despite the reinvention, Dean Hammond wasn't all that. Average midfielder when the rose-tinted specs are off. Certainly no better than Paul Reid.
 


bhadeb

New member
Jan 11, 2008
1,257
This club has missed Dean Hammond since he left - never really been replaced by a proper signing other than loans
 






British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
Despite the reinvention, Dean Hammond wasn't all that. Average midfielder when the rose-tinted specs are off. Certainly no better than Paul Reid.

He worked bloody well alongside Bertin though, Shame they did'nt get more matches together.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,352
He worked bloody well alongside Bertin though, Shame they did'nt get more matches together.

For sure. But the annoying thing on here is that folk tend to mythologise ex-players WAY beyond the part they played at the time. Dean Hammond was distinctly AVERAGE for those with eyes to see and interpret what they are watching while he was with the Albion. A few flashes of decent stuff, but overall what we should be expecting - as standard! - from anybody in the stripes.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
This club has missed Dean Hammond since he left - never really been replaced by a proper signing other than loans

Have we really missed what he brought to the team, or was it more that his leaving sent a harmful message to the squad?

I mean...

I've heard lots of different, sometimes contradictory, reasons for Wilkins's firing, each reason is "from a reliable source inside the club".

One of those reasons is that Wilkins backed Hammond during contract negotiations.

Seems a silly reason to fire someone (the manager should always go to bat for his players in the boardroom, they will then go to bat for him on the pitch, even if the board members overrule the manager in the end).

However, what message would the players take? The board had an opinion of Hammond. Hammond had an opinion of himself. And Wilkins - someone relatively neutral shared Hammond's appraisal.

The board stuck to their guns, they then fired Wilkins (assuming the umour is true, and I don't mean to give it any more weight than any of the other 5 or 6 rumours I've heard).

So as far as the players are concerned: the board has a lower opinion of them than they have of themselves, or what a neutral may think. They fired the one person who stood up for them in the boardroom.

It would be pointless of the board to fire one manager for siding with the players and replace him with someone else who would side with the players, so Mickey will side with the board. Even if Slade isn't usually inclined that way, he is trying to get a permanent contract, so he's not going to upset the board.

Who have the players got? Throughout this season they've had managers who won't go to bat for them in the boardroom, so why should they go to bat fr the manager on the pitch?

And is that more of an issue than the team missing any particular attribute that Dean Hammond brought to the team?
 




B-Rad

New member
Jan 22, 2009
76
Milton Keynes
i dont think we shud have to miss dean 'i think i should play in the championship even if it is for 2 months cos im better than league 1 for a bit, altho ill be back ther asap' hammond. a good manager would have found a replacement. we never got a manager with the eyeballs to sort that out
 


Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
If we have to go down I hope Hammond scores the goal.

We have never replaced him and all those people who said he was crap look stupid now.
 


Dick Knights Mumm

Take me Home Falmer Road
Jul 5, 2003
19,736
Hither and Thither
Despite the reinvention, Dean Hammond wasn't all that. Average midfielder when the rose-tinted specs are off. Certainly no better than Paul Reid.

Was Reid actually any good ? He was just too light-weight wasn't he ? Not strong enough to win you the ball, and not a good enough passer to make a big difference. Did he ever have a real run in the team ? I don't think any of the managers really trusted him. No great loss to the club.

I think Hammond was a player that we miss. He was strong and drove the team forward. If you see your team mates making the runs he made it makes you play better. Plus he scored goals. He was a quality League One/Championship player.
 




drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,627
Burgess Hill
If we have to go down I hope Hammond scores the goal.

We have never replaced him and all those people who said he was crap look stupid now.

Why. If anyone looks stupid it is Dean Hammond. First, he believes his agents hype. Second, he believes he's good enough for the Championship. Third (bearing in mind the second) he signed for a club doomed for relegation back to the league he thinks he is too good for.

He was an average player, no more no less. When O'Callaghan was here, Hammond disappeared during the game. Colchester, hardly setting the world alight in league 1.
 


Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
10,243
saaf of the water
Despite the reinvention, Dean Hammond wasn't all that. Average midfielder when the rose-tinted specs are off. Certainly no better than Paul Reid.

But he was a midfield player who actually SCORED GOALS.

I would like to know how many goals our central midfield players have scored between them this season?

He was certainly better than 'average'.

Agree about Reid - I think he never really got a decent run in the side in his best position - central midfield.
 


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Shame he didn't really want to play for us.
 




Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
Why. If anyone looks stupid it is Dean Hammond. First, he believes his agents hype. Second, he believes he's good enough for the Championship. Third (bearing in mind the second) he signed for a club doomed for relegation back to the league he thinks he is too good for.

He was an average player, no more no less. When O'Callaghan was here, Hammond disappeared during the game. Colchester, hardly setting the world alight in league 1.

Re: bold text
Would signing for a team destined for our division not suggest that the idea he "thought he was better than our division" is a false one? The idea that he had those opinions is more at best a bitter fan hurt he left, at worse a propaganda campaign against him from people trying to hide the fact we didn't do more to keep him?
 


HP Seagull

Danny Cullip: Hero
Sep 26, 2008
1,801
Despite the reinvention, Dean Hammond wasn't all that. Average midfielder when the rose-tinted specs are off. Certainly no better than Paul Reid.

Disagree. There are some players that are looked back on as better than they were, but I don't think Hammond is one of them.

He was strong on the ball, good in the air, won the ball and used it well. Admittedly not the quickest, but he was our captain, penalty taker, and scored goals. Off the top of my head I'm thinking of the West Ham game at home where we drew 2-2 and he scored both goals. We have not had a midfielder since that could have done that.
 








dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Here we go again. It was sell him or let him go for nothing at the end of the season. And by the way, why can't you disagree with someone without resorting to insults?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here