Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Dean Blackwell - were the Albion too generous ?



Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,346
Location Location
Its an immotive subject, as its always sad when a players career comes to an end because of injury. But the bare facts are that despite the Albion being in utterly dire financial straights, we handed a renewed 12 month contract to an aging player who had just picked up another long-term injury. For a 34/35 year old to come back from a cruciate ligament injury was always going to be a big ask. Far younger players than Blackwell have often never recovered.

Now it was an honourable and magnificent gesture by the Albion, particularly as no doubt Blackwell would have been one of the higher wage-earners at the club. But it was also a hugely costly one. Eyebrows were raised at the time that contract was given, and the harsh reality is that, from the clubs point of view, it turned out to be money down the drain. With a painfully thin squad, there's no getting away from the fact that the money could have been better used to bring in another MUCH NEEDED player to bolster the team.

The Albion really didn't owe Blackwell anything. He made 21 apearances for us, not even half a season, so we're not talking about a stalwart who'd given us many years of good service. Players know that careers are short, and sometimes shortened further by injury. Dean Blackwell wasn't the first and he won't be the last to have his last couple of seasons taken away from him because of injury. Players usually have insurance, they have the PFA, the Albion really didn't owe Dean a living.

I know this is harsh, and I'll probably be shot down for saying it. But my primary concern is NOT for any individual players welfare at the club. My primary concern is for the Albion, and the success of the Albion as a whole. I'm sure Dean is a smashing bloke, and the platitudes for his attitude and spirit are no doubt well deserved. But this club is not doing itself any favours by keeping on aging, injured players who are unlikely to ever fully recover, at the expense of bringing in new blood who can help the team to survive.

It certainly was a nice thing to do. But was it the right thing to do ?
 




Bobby's Gull

DAFT Bint
Jul 6, 2003
2,009
Bed
He played well for us, and was certainly a quality player when we last in the first div. The Albion knew it was a risk keeping him on, in the view that he might never recover, but I guess Coppell thought it was a risk worth taking. I know I felt that it was and that the Albion were right to honour his contract which had been sorted out before his injury. Not much use crying over spilt milk now is there, we've both lost out. The Albion and Blackwell.
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,346
Location Location
Don't get me wrong, I'm not angry at the club over this, and I can understand why they renewed that contract given the sad circumstances. But it was a decision made by the heart and not by the head.
 


B.M.F

New member
Aug 2, 2003
7,272
wherever the money is
I am with you on this one Easy. I got shot down for saying a similar thing on another thread but think the money oul have helped secure a big target man
 


Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
I presume the club followed Steve Coppell's advice about this and it backfired.
Manager's decisions have to be trusted or else there isn't a working relationship.
Some decisions will work out and some won't.

On one side, I think paying Kitson for a whole season was a waste of money (yes, I know he got the winning goal at Reading) whereas paying Blackwell wasn't.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,965
Pattknull med Haksprut
The reason why Blackwell was given the contract was that he and Coppell had verbally agreed to the deal before the injury was sustained.

In some quarters people believe that their word is their bond, and DK is in that camp.

Before coming to the Albion Blackwell was without a club, so he was not on big money as some claim, but about £700 a week plus appearance and bonus money, which he would not have earned as he did not play last season.

In case you did not notice, we were promoted last season without him, so it did not affect the team adversely. His contract ran out on 1 July so we have not been paying him since then either.

My personal view is that the club did the right thing, and it is actions like this that help make the team so close knit and work for each other, as they realise they are not working for a bunch of wankers.
 




Indeed. I think all our current players would be pretty pissed off if we had shat on Blackwell like that. Important for team morale that players are supported when injured.
 






seagull over spain

New member
Mar 25, 2004
155
torrevieja spain
As the injury was sustained whilst under contract, I would assume that he was insured by the club in which case would the insurance have not covered his pay? Until the point where they felt he may not recover enough.
 








timbha

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,459
Sussex
seagull over spain said:
As the injury was sustained whilst under contract, I would assume that he was insured by the club in which case would the insurance have not covered his pay? Until the point where they felt he may not recover enough.

insurer doesn't pay out when a player is injured (otherwise the Albion would have made a fortune out of Kitson, Blackwell, Rodger, Roberts, Kuipers, Watson, .......). Insurer will only pay out when player is medically and permanently declared unable to fulfil his contract.

Interesting point made by Easy10 - think Knight/Coppell were too hasty/ill advised in offering the full one year contract, knowing Blackwell's injury was career threatening. Would 3 or 6 months not have been more reasonable? Bet Blackwell's agent still got his cut.

From reading Oatway's and Jones' columns in the Argus it seems like Blackwell has a few bob stashed away - good luck to him - a pro footballer for 15+ years (in Premier) must be a bit of a mug if he hasn't got a nice some tucked away for his retirement. In some ways the player is better off being declared medically unfit to continue playing (insurance/pension/PFA) rather than being released as many are in their early/mid thirties.

DB doesn't deserve a benefit match from the club - doubt Wimbledon will - but he served us well during his brief stay.
 


Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,821
I know where you're coming from Easy and I have an element of sympathy with your view. If the club was run by hard-nosed business men soley concerned with the 'bottom line' (or indeed people just wishing to see the value of their investment increase before they cash in) then Blackwell wouldn't have had a sniff of a new contract - verbal agreement or not.

However whilst it was an extremely poor short-term business decision it was the 'right' decision. No, I can't define 'right' other than by saying the club behaved decently, it has been shown as treating players as humans not just as machine parts to be bought, sold and discarded as the needs of the organisation change. There is no doubt it has cost us money we can ill afford; shareholders, business analysts and those who judge a club solely by how successful it is on the pitch will be dismayed. However if you think that there's more to a football club that a healthy balance sheet and trophies then you have to applaud the club's decision.
 




Lammy

Registered Abuser
Oct 1, 2003
7,581
Newhaven/Lewes/Atlanta
Sad though it is IMHO it's 1 down two to go.

Roger and Watson anyone?

Watson isn't even injured yet our cash rich clb has been carrying homn for two seasons now!
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,881
West Sussex
I think it's great that the club stick by their players like this. This sort of loyalty and commitment will be repaid over and over again when players are thinking about renewing contracts etc... or when young players are wondering about their futures.

It doesn't mean we should be 'soft touches' - and I don't think we are. The recent short term contracts for players in the 'last chance saloon' like Lee and Rodger are a very good way of dealing with these sort of issues... well done MM!
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,212
Lammy said:
Watson isn't even injured yet our cash rich clb has been carrying homn for two seasons now!

It says in the Argus today that Watson 'has not played this season after major surgery on a prolapsed disc'
 








Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
attila said:
Was absolutely the right thing to do. Treat people decently: honour agreements! I'm sure it's down to stuff like that the team spirit is so good.

Without which, in our current situation we'd be down with Leyton Orient
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here