phoenix
Well-known member
- May 18, 2009
- 2,867
Oh were getting the picky now it seems you know what i mean. Well doneMIDFIELD!
Not midfielder.
Oh were getting the picky now it seems you know what i mean. Well doneMIDFIELD!
Not midfielder.
Yes, you were talking about a midfielder (singular), whereas the point was about a 'midfield'. Are you sure that you know what you mean?Oh were getting the picky now it seems you know what i mean. Well done
Thanks can't read as i'm not a subsciber but i take your word for it as i always respect your postsFor example, the reliable David Ornstein.
https://theathletic.com/5230576/2024/01/26/kiernan-dewsbury-hall-brighton-leicester/
Whereas as you know the sum of shit
Thanks i'm not the best at coveying my thoughtsYes, you were talking about a midfielder (singular), whereas the point was about a 'midfield'. Are you sure that you know what you mean?
Are you trying to suggest that had Potter stayed, we'd still have Caicedo and MacAllister?We had arguably the second or third best midfield in the league at the end of Potter’s last full season. We’re easily in the bottom 10 now. Without Gilmour bottom three.
Yes, that's the smoke ..............................Going by the media guesswork, we’re paying £160k pw, for 10 months to 30 June normally, that’s a £6.9m punt that appears to have failed. Not significant when you look at the total cash lost on disastrous Locadia and Jahanbakhsh.
As you say we’ll never know, but I wonder if they did feature well in StarLizard data. Two random wildcards suggested solely by RDZ and accepted by TB appears to against the grain of his methodology.
They were always leaving. so you are 100% correct .Are you trying to suggest that had Potter stayed, we'd still have Caicedo and MacAllister?
No humiliation intended at all - was pointing out that you grasped the wrong end of a stick and ran with it, that's all.Thanks i'm not the best at coveying my thoughts
Sorry i'm a whitehawk boy we didn't always do school
So you are a lot more clever than me i congradulate you on the humiliation.
I think it is you that doesn't under stand what you're sayingOh were getting the picky now it seems you know what i mean. Well done
A midfield. Not a midfielder. Try to read properly. Caicedo + Biss + Mac Allister = a midfield and around 190 - 200 mill in total deal value depending on whose prices you believeA midfielder for nearly 200 million youre getting desperate now . Considering the British record is 115 million pray please tell me ? Of course i'm referiing to Brighton.
So up to 170 mill is that 200mill and i don't understand ?? you were donig ok until you said i DON'T understand How is 170 mil 200 mil ? I'm not after trouble but please don't tell me i don't understand what i'm saying .I think it is you that doesn't under stand what you're saying
Caicedo + Mac Allister = £115m + £35m rising to £55m - up to £170m
ok £200m is a bit of a stretch, but last season's total transfer income was well over £220m
Our match day income from Premier League games is roughly £1m per game.Going by the media guesswork, we’re paying £160k pw, for 10 months to 30 June normally, that’s a £6.9m punt that appears to have failed. Not significant when you look at the total cash lost on disastrous Locadia and Jahanbakhsh.
As you say we’ll never know, but I wonder if they did feature well in StarLizard data. Two random wildcards suggested solely by RDZ and accepted by TB appears to against the grain of his methodology.
You still haven't made a comment about what tactic you think he should try?He's using the same tactic no matter who he has available and whoever the opponent is. When your best players are out, you find a way to optimize the smaller and/or different tool kit of each replacement. If the only way to break a low block with your system is to have speedy wingers outrun the defence, then that's on you. If you still haven't found a way to keep a clean sheet with your system, that's on you. Klopp is showing just how to do that. Moyes, too.
But I'm not disappointed (too much). I'm just getting flashbacks from the past 5 years my Ottawa Senators have languished in the NHL basement despite having many very talented young players because the GM stuck with a coach (his guy, obviously) who had blinders on, lol. He was replaced 2-3 months ago, and the downward spiral has stopped.
.
the OP was also including Biss.So up to 170 mill is that 200mill and i don't understand ?? you were donig ok until you said i DON'T understand How is 170 mil 200 mil
Probably not - but if Caicedo and Mac Allister had stayed, we might still have RDZ next season!Are you trying to suggest that had Potter stayed, we'd still have Caicedo and MacAllister?
The quote was "A midfielder for nearly 200 million" so that is presumably a midfielder not the whole midfield ?So up to 170 mill is that 200mill and i don't understand ?? you were donig ok until you said i DON'T understand How is 170 mil 200 mil ? I'm not after trouble but please don't tell me i don't understand what i'm saying .
it wasn't .The quote was "A midfielder for nearly 200 million" so that is presumably a midfielder not the whole midfield ?
Wouldn't argue with that but that's how we roll. If players weren't allowed to move on then there's less likelihood we'll sign them in the first place!!!Probably not - but if Caicedo and Mac Allister had stayed, we might still have RDZ next season!
Ha ha Biss left a long time before are you having a laugh .There is now way on earth you can include Biss if you wan't a truce feel free to message meA midfield. Not a midfielder. Try to read properly. Caicedo + Biss + Mac Allister = a midfield and around 190 - 200 mill in total deal value depending on whose prices you believe