Mustafa II
Well-known member
Can anyone explain to me why we agreed this mutual thing when we could have just held on to him for a couple of weeks and got the full compensation?!
Did we think he wouldn't have interest from other clubs?
I can only assume there was no guarantee that Chelsea, or anyone else for that matter, would go for him in a timely fashion.
Doing it this way, along with the reported clause that will bag us 75% of the compensation, allows the club to be in control of the situation.
It's actually genius by the club. We're sacking a manager, not only without having to buy out his contract, but also getting us a few quid when he inevitably moves to Chelsea.
Very impressive.