desprateseagull
New member
so the Metropolitan Police are 'convicted' of failing to protect the public on health and safety grounds, during the lead up to the tragic shooting of this (innocent) guy..
what puzzles me is -
why there was only one guy observing the block of flats, with no cover when he needed a leak (presume thats what they meant by having to releive himself, or was the job that boring?)
why armed police took so long to get on the case, ivo failed bomb attempts the day before.
and why no one thought to try and stop the guy long before he got into a confined, crowded space like the underground?
I wouldnt mind being stopped (just once, mind) if cops thought i looked like someone else, rather than let the whole thing go tits up, and someone ends up dead.
Ian Blair's statement after the case seemed to make out they were entirely justified in shooting an innocent person, 'for the greather good..'
what puzzles me is -
why there was only one guy observing the block of flats, with no cover when he needed a leak (presume thats what they meant by having to releive himself, or was the job that boring?)
why armed police took so long to get on the case, ivo failed bomb attempts the day before.
and why no one thought to try and stop the guy long before he got into a confined, crowded space like the underground?
I wouldnt mind being stopped (just once, mind) if cops thought i looked like someone else, rather than let the whole thing go tits up, and someone ends up dead.
Ian Blair's statement after the case seemed to make out they were entirely justified in shooting an innocent person, 'for the greather good..'