David Stockdale

[BUTTERBALL]

 

[Thunder Bolt]

[tweet]857294783731159043[/tweet]

 

[BensGrandad]

Forget all of them David and stay were you are by signing another contract, you know it makes sense.

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

Thankfully Leeds appear to be looking at a Championship future.

 

[samtheseagull]

Don't understand why we wouldn't offer him 2 years. Even if he didn't cut it next year we would be able to sell him for a decent fee.

 

[Weststander]

Stockdale = Norwich's 12th man.

 

[sir albion]

Don't understand why we wouldn't offer him 2 years. Even if he didn't cut it next year we would be able to sell him for a decent fee.

Probably have but he's waiting for better offers more than likely.Im not fussed either way and would happily take westwood from Sheffield Wednesday

 

[BensGrandad]

Probably have but he's waiting for better offers more than likely.Im not fussed either way and would happily take westwood from Sheffield Wednesday

Must admit he would make a good replacement but not sure they would sell him to us.

 

[sir albion]

Must admit he would make a good replacement but not sure they would sell him to us.

He would jump at the chance if they fail in the playoffs

 

[Weststander]

it will all be decided by £££££££

Exactly. Let's remember agents are stirrers due also to their £££ cut.

When the Albion offer Stockdale triple his wages (average PL wages are 4 times those of the Championship to benchmark), he will stay with his Albion mates.

If Leeds stay down, they wouldn't be able to compete with that.

 

[BensGrandad]

He would jump at the chance if they fail in the playoffs

He may but would Wednesday consider selling him.

 

[sparkie]

I wonder whether at least one new contract announcement will be made on 14th May...

Interesting.

 

[crasher]

Probably have but he's waiting for better offers more than likely.Im not fussed either way and would happily take westwood from Sheffield Wednesday

Westwood's a good keeper but I think Stocko is better. Anyway, why would we turn down a 'free' signing in favour of a huge transfer fee to Wednesday? And that's assuming they don't go up themselves.

 

[samtheseagull]

Interesting.

Why the 14th?

 

[Greg Bobkin]

Why the 14th?

Parade day.

 

[BensGrandad]

Westwood's a good keeper but I think Stocko is better. Anyway, why would we turn down a 'free' signing in favour of a huge transfer fee to Wednesday? And that's assuming they don't go up themselves.

Not turning down a free signing but if he wont sign a new contract we would have to get a replacement if Maenpaa also doesnt sign a new contract.

 

[crasher]

Not turning down a free signing but if he wont sign a new contract we would have to get a replacement if Maenpaa also doesnt sign a new contract.

Yes - obviously we can't force Stocko to sign a new contract. But I hope (and think) he will. The previous poster seemed to be suggesting we shouldn't worry about trying to seal the deal because we could buy another goalkeeper. Which is true, but let's keep the excellent one we've already got.

 

[Dick Swiveller]

Don't worry, Wayne Hennesey is available on a free.

How many Tiger Tokens would we need?

 

[Weststander]

Westwood's a good keeper but I think Stocko is better. Anyway, why would we turn down a 'free' signing in favour of a huge transfer fee to Wednesday? And that's assuming they don't go up themselves.

True and the same with Stephens. It would be idiotic to let a quality player go over wages for free, then pay huge unnecessary transfer fees out of a limited budget to replace him.

Best to ignore TalkSport lies. You can only rely on the broadsheets, but it's less interesting because true transfer news is infrequent.

 

[Joshski]

Link to Leeds mentioned again in the mirror according to sky sports news paper talk