David Cameron bottles a meeting with Nigel Farage?

[sydney]

I'd rather he just 'bottled' Nigel Farage if I'm honest ...

i'd rather cameron recieved to be fair....

 

[Gwylan]

... those from the Socialist group in the European Parliament.

Who have 190 members compared to the EFDD's 45 - seems like a no-brainer to me

 

[brighton fella]

Well i reckon Cameron will get precious little out of talks and propositions today with EU countries. He will try and talk them up when he gets back and hope that the voters are hoodwinked. The proof will be on what side of the fence his own party members like Boris fall.

i think the majority of public will see through his flannel, but i still maintain that boris and co will when it comes to it put party before country..

 

[Simster]

Who have 190 members compared to the EFDD's 45 - seems like a no-brainer to me

Spot on. Soulman is typical of rabid EU outers. Absolutely screaming to be involved, but their job is done and they are now doing more harm than good with their incessant blaming of the EU or anyone who ignore their pressure group, for absolutely everything.
[MENTION=26105]Soulman[/MENTION] - wake up. Our piggy faced PM has absolutely no need to meet Farage and his ilk. He is not running scared, he just doesn't need to do it.

 

[Soulman]

i think the majority of public will see through his flannel, but i still maintain that boris and co will when it comes to it put party before country..

It is a charade.

David Cameron's EU deal can't be legally binding, EU Parliament president Martin Schulz says.
David Cameron’s package of EU reforms cannot be made legally binding before the British public vote on it, the president of the European Parliament has said.
Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all.
The president’s statement means that Britain may not get the deal agreed by Mr Cameron if it ultimately votes to stay IN the EU.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...nt-president-martin-schulz-says-a6876861.html

 

[Soulman]

Spot on. Soulman is typical of rabid EU outers. Absolutely screaming to be involved, but their job is done and they are now doing more harm than good with their incessant blaming of the EU or anyone who ignore their pressure group, for absolutely everything.
[MENTION=26105]Soulman[/MENTION] - wake up. Our piggy faced PM has absolutely no need to meet Farage and his ilk. He is not running scared, he just doesn't need to do it.

Jeez, i know, i have fully woken up thanks, but why was it Mr. Cameron was scheduled to meet with European Parliament group leaders – Mr. Farage included – tomorrow in Brussels. If he had no intention and only wanted to meet the IN Euro leaders then why not just do that instead of looking foolish and lying.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

I'm no fan of Cameron but support his decision to swerve Farage. Why should he meet him?

 

[Simster]

Jeez, i know, i have fully woken up thanks, but why was it Mr. Cameron was scheduled to meet with European Parliament group leaders – Mr. Farage included – tomorrow in Brussels. If he had no intention and only wanted to meet the IN Euro leaders then why not just do that instead of looking foolish and lying.

He's not looking foolish at all FFS. You're kidding yourself.

There is so obviously nothing to be gained from him wasting his time meeting a gobshite like Farage.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

i think the majority of public will see through his flannel, but i still maintain that boris and co will when it comes to it put party before country..

Boris will do what's best for Boris.

 

[brighton fella]

It is a charade.

David Cameron's EU deal can't be legally binding, EU Parliament president Martin Schulz says.
David Cameron’s package of EU reforms cannot be made legally binding before the British public vote on it, the president of the European Parliament has said.
Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all.
The president’s statement means that Britain may not get the deal agreed by Mr Cameron if it ultimately votes to stay IN the EU.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...nt-president-martin-schulz-says-a6876861.html

exactly, how can you trust them when any kind of deal can be overturned. cameron knows this anyway but he's just trying to flannel the public,,, and those of the public who are soppy buy this

 

[brighton fella]

Boris will do what's best for Boris.

he's nothing but a brought man just like the rest of them.

 

[sydney]

I'm no fan of Cameron but support his decision to swerve Farage. Why should he meet him?

as you live in boxheadsville now surely you don't expect anyone to give a flying fanny fart what you think.....!!??

 

[brighton fella]

I'm no fan of Cameron but support his decision to swerve Farage. Why should he meet him?

: because it would be pleasurable to see farage rip him apart that is why

 

[The Birdman]

Is David Cameron too busy to meet with Nigel Farage MEP or is he lacking courage? Surely, in the interests of the electorate Cameron's begging must be scrutinised.

it should be David Bottles the Pratt Farage

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

It is a charade.

David Cameron's EU deal can't be legally binding, EU Parliament president Martin Schulz says.
David Cameron’s package of EU reforms cannot be made legally binding before the British public vote on it, the president of the European Parliament has said.
Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all.
The president’s statement means that Britain may not get the deal agreed by Mr Cameron if it ultimately votes to stay IN the EU.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...nt-president-martin-schulz-says-a6876861.html

All Schulz is saying is that to be legally binding any agreement by the Council and the UK also has to be approved by the European Parliament; that's not a surprise surely and isn't it desirable?
Why would the UK government decide to hold a referendum before this has been done?

 

[Soulman]

All Schulz is saying is that to be legally binding any agreement by the Council and the UK also has to be approved by the European Parliament; that's not a surprise surely and isn't it desirable?
Why would the UK government decide to hold a referendum before this has been done?

So the UK voters could vote IN thinking that the deals that Cameron has asked for have been agreed to....only to find out afterwards that "Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all".

So in other words the UK public could be voting thinking issues have been solved when clearly they can be changed after the votes.

 

[topbanana36]

So the UK voters could vote IN thinking that the deals that Cameron has asked for have been agreed to....only to find out afterwards that "Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all".

So in other words the UK public could be voting thinking issues have been solved when clearly they can be changed after the votes.

All a joke! Cameron knows that there will be no treaty change and he is trying to dupe the British public just like Heath

From 1971

http://www.euexit.com/fco-30-1048.html

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

So the UK voters could vote IN thinking that the deals that Cameron has asked for have been agreed to....only to find out afterwards that "Martin Schulz said the European Parliament could amend any deal done at today’s summit and would not necessarily even rubber-stamp it at all".

So in other words the UK public could be voting thinking issues have been solved when clearly they can be changed after the votes.

There's a clue in the second sentence of my initial post that may answer your "concerns"; I also believe the date of the referendum has yet to be announced. Capiche?

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

All a joke! Cameron knows that there will be no treaty change and he is trying to dupe the British public just like Heath

From 1971

http://www.euexit.com/fco-30-1048.html

A treaty change will require a referendum in the UK.

 

[WATFORD zero]

I'm stunned at you all leaping in with your opinions before you have seen Pretty Pink Fairy's in depth analysis of the situation