Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
I’d be amazed if we pay that. Better back ups available for less money than that. Particularly as this back up is guaranteed some league game time in January.
Interest in Krull from Barcelona, out of contract, so that's him gone. Nothing we can offer will match benching at Barcelona.
Walton and BHA want him playing Championship with Wigan and that is better for him and us than benching with Albion.
Button is experienced keeper cover and if Roberts is happy, Hughton will take him on board. Must admit the fee seems a bit steep, but hey, nothing really for us to discuss here.
Do we know that Krul has gone yet? Interest in a player is one thing, them actually signing him is quite another. In the report that l ead Barca were interested in several keepers, not just Krul.
We won't be signing any newe keepers until, or unless, he is confirmed as leaving the club.
Won't happen
Just The Goalkeeper is the one position where CH always sticks to experience.
At Newcastle he had 2 excellent keepers who were well thought of in their youth and who went on to be Internationals and ne didn't play them - Krull and Fraser Foster. They both went out on loan
At Birmingham he had similar with Jack Butland and didn't play him.
It just seems to be a position where he doesn't take as many chances with the youngsters and to be honest I sort of agree with it because you could be sitting at 0 - 0 agaist a relegation rival and a howler by the keeper costs you 3 points. The stakes are just too high now and thats why you need an experienced back up keeper because I think Maty Ryan's mistakes lessened when Tim Krull came in as back up.
Worked well for Burnley with Pope, surely not too much difference with the two clubs and keepers. Walton is no longer inexperienced having had seasons with Luton and Wigan respectively.
He is out of contract and it's been 2-3 weeks without any news that he has resigned for another season or two... therefore I'd say its a done deal he's going, the only question is where and who replaces him.
Irrespective of the reasoning this is about as uninspiring as it gets, isn't it?
Also £4m seems an awful lot of money...
If you wanna sit at the table with the ''Big Boys'' you gotta open your wallet and put yer ''chips'' down on the table
I’m with the coaching staff on this. If they don’t want to put Walton in a position where he will have to play a lot of games when Ryan is away that could be the difference between staying up and a relegation fight I’m happy to trust them, rather than buy into the hype (although justifiable) of a player we’ve not seen and hasn’t played above League One standard
Apart from his three games (conceding one goal in total) in the Championship, for Brighton, of course
If we signed a player who had made 3 experiences in the Championship, would we call him a championship player or league one (or wherever he spent the majority of his career)