Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Do you think Rutter has a potential huge resale value? I don’t think anyone’s paying £40m at the moment.Won't be considered due to wages and resale value.
Do you think Rutter has a potential huge resale value? I don’t think anyone’s paying £40m at the moment.Won't be considered due to wages and resale value.
Won't be considered due to wages and resale value.
Yes it would be a good move for us.Allegedly available for £50-£60m. Would a loan with a permanent deal in the summer be a good move for us?
£50-60m obviously a tonne of cash and assume he'll be on hefty wages too.
Do you think Rutter has a potential huge resale value? I don’t think anyone’s paying £40m at the moment.
Yeah - Nunez has no reason to be looking at a wages drop. I'm sure plenty of other wealthy clubs would consider him being worth a punt.I'm not sure every single signing has to fit the resale model, we do need some more experienced players in our squad. Regarding wages, I agree it'd be a stretch.
100%Yes it would be a good move for us.
For him it'd be a pretty shite one though which is why it won't happen. He'll move to another big club if he goes.
If we were to spend that kind of money, I would rather we try and sign Delap from IpswichAllegedly available for £50-£60m. Would a loan with a permanent deal in the summer be a good move for us?
£50-60m obviously a tonne of cash and assume he'll be on hefty wages too.
We paid £7m in wages to that injury prone kid from BarcaI'm not sure every single signing has to fit the resale model, we do need some more experienced players in our squad. Regarding wages, I agree it'd be a stretch.
Doesn't need one - we'll amortise his fee over the next few years so anything we get by the time we sell him will be 'profit' even if we don't 'make' money on him.Do you think Rutter has a potential huge resale value? I don’t think anyone’s paying £40m at the moment.
In this case the combination of high wages, high fee, low resale value is the issue.The ‘only sign players with high resale potential’ is as outdated a myth as the whole ‘no dickhead’ thing. We will sign a player if the price is right and the need is there.
The other thing is that far more clubs have switched onto the strategy of buying young talent scouted from far afield, to develop and sell on.The ‘only sign players with high resale potential’ is as outdated a myth as the whole ‘no dickhead’ thing. We will sign a player if the price is right and the need is there.
He is on a huge contract, but he's also consistently not justifying it.I don’t think anyone is taking this seriously - at least I hope not. He’s reported to be on £140,000 per week basic, plus hefty goal, assist and appearance bonuses. Until June 2028.
When he goes it’ll be to one of a handful of clubs in the world who can afford him.
That’s my point we don’t need to make huge profit on every player.Doesn't need one - we'll amortise his fee over the next few years so anything we get by the time we sell him will be 'profit' even if we don't 'make' money on him.
The issue is that he has three and a half years remaining on that guaranteed deal. He is unlikely wanting to accept a pay cut, the most likely outcome would be a loan or series of loans where the wage cost is shared between both clubs. Lukaku for example is/was on a reported £300k a week and Chelsea were thrilled to get a third of that as a wage contribution for his loans.He is on a huge contract, but he's also consistently not justifying it.
His next contract will likely be a fair bit lower, don't you think?
(I do however agree that I don't see him as a potential target for us anytime soon...)
Good to know. Do you think he'll play vs. Norwich or be held off for the league?Welbeck is better.