Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
darren currie
- Thread starter vulture
- Start date
Stinkers Bridge
New member
He played in the Luton reserves at Southend on Tuesday on his way back from injury and could be available for selection for the first team's game at Root's Hall on Saturday.
Appearing soon at an employment tribunal then?
Marshy
Well-known member
Id give him a years deal, escpecially with the uncertainty hanging around Cox
Snap him up - but to be honest, this is just another one of "those " threads isn't it.
Skidmarks
New member
Never gonna happen, if we were to get Currie we surely would of got Cullip as well.
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Why? Are they linked somehow?
Skidmarks
New member
Both ex-Albion players, both avaliable during the transfer window, both in their 30's, both past their best, both linked with the Albion this season, both ....... you get the message
One plays in a position where we are lacking depth. One doesn't.
Crap comment of the year award!
Lush
Mods' Pet
If we get rid of Bowditch (which we should) and if Cox is having an extended strop then we could do with someone who can put in a decent ball.
Skidmarks
New member
Completely agree but its more to do with what Dick and Dean want for the future by the sounds of things, Currie hasn't been linked since the last day of the window and we were looking at Currie and Cullip at a time when players like Westlake and Bowditch weren't at the club and Elphick and Lynch were injured.
Would love to see Currie back but i don't think the wage would open the door
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Don't think we were ever linked with Cullip. We actually turned him down we he asked to train with us. Currie however we were linked to.
Skidmarks
New member
love your opinion Arrid, full of knowledge i see, these two were both linked at the same time if you knew what was happening during the transfer window, but rumour had it the club didn't want to make transfers which could suggest the clubs gone backwards.
Crap comment of the year? Probably for you:.
Last edited:
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
The club didn't want to make transfer? Despite the fact we brought in our most expensive signing in twenty five years, a couple of midfielders and a defender on loan. Doesn't seem like not wanting to make transfers to me.
Skidmarks
New member
surley he would take anything, luton arnt even paying there players at the moment
Aren't they extremely close to a takeover? or has it already happened?
would it be wise to sell a top player when in a relegation battle?
love your opinion Arrid, full of knowledge i see, these two were both linked at the same time if you knew what was happening during the transfer window, but rumour had it the club didn't want to make transfers which could suggest the clubs gone backwards.
Crap comment of the year? Probably for you:.
Err, Clever boy, Cullip was never ever, at any stage, linked with a return back to BHA during the transfer window "Fact".
Skidmarks
New member
HHHHMMMM Well i know as much as you and that means we weren't given any facts until they were bought, and rumoar had it when Cullip was made avaliable jan/feb there was talk of him comming back , just like when Luton went into administration and Currie was linked with the Albion, talk but no facts.
I think you have to remember that the majority of football rumoars like the current Currie claims can't be "FACT"untill bought. My point is that its obvious that the club wouldn't want to sign old players as they want to look like a club moving forward hence why i mentioned why Cullip wasn't bought and as much as i would love to see him back, neither will Currie.
Clever boy
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Cullip said himself that he was turned down by the Albion. We didn't want him, its a fact. No one (apart from NSC) ever mentioned Cullip. Currie we actually had down here for talks and the Luton manager changed his mind about selling him to us.