Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
I'm not a fan of the arms sales either to be honest
I’ll look out for the next thread and loads of posts on it.
I'm not a fan of the arms sales either to be honest
If I was a betting man my money would be on the fee (if in fact we do sell him) being nearer to £15M than £20M. We shall see (although tbf the banker bet would be on an undisclosed fee!)I've said 20 million from the start and I'm sticking to it
I’ll look out for the next thread and loads of posts on it.
Sky sports saying we've turned down a second bid of £10m, saying we want between £12m to £15m.
Arms sales is firmly politics category. Political threads on NSC are usually disappointingly split between Tory or Labour bashing. They are the political threads which often have the most (repetitive) posts. Most politically motivated posters here are simply only interested in proving a point on why their selected party/leader is so much better or more likely why the other lot are not. It is not particularly constructive and most people are not interested in posting on them.
Newcastle being owned by a murderous regime that we happen to send loads of arms to is a football matter to a lot of people. It is the issue which has crossed over into the reason this board exists, supporting the Albion and in a wider context, protecting the game we love. It doesn't mean anyone will necessarily want to argue outside of those issues.
Sky sports saying we've turned down a second bid of £10m, so SKY are now guessing that this means we want between £12m to £15m.
What I find amazing, odd, hypocritical maybe, is that there seems to be very little protest, complaint or criticism that we’ve potentially sold £20bn worth of arms and munitions to them since they started bombing Yemen in 2015, yet buy a football club and choose the manage them and it’s time to take them to task! I’m a bit more worried about our continued arming of their regime, for this country’s profit than who manages or plays for Newcastle United. Let’s get things in perspective.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/saudi-arabia-uk-arms-sale-b1884158.html%3Famp
Does Burn only go if we find a replacement?
This happens to be a (Brighton mainly) football forum though, head over to Guns 'N' Ammo Chat for discussions on ethical arms dealing.
I’m pretty sure we won’t be saying we want between £12m and £15m - not great negotiating tactics!
Great, glad you have no issue over Newcastle’s ownership etc as you’re not bothered by arms dealing either. That’s exactly what I’m talking about.
No. We cope with what we've got/replace from within.Does Burn only go if we find a replacement?
Jeff Stelling taking the piss out of Newcastle's latest bid earlier [emoji106][emoji1787]
I have issue with both, however, in recent news, the Saudis bought NUFC. Arms deals are an older and ongoing issue, not involving any ethical decision to be made by footballers, football managers or football supporters about which club badge they will be kissing this season.