saafend_seagull
Well-known member
If you believe the sun.
[tweet]1472341060240252928[/tweet]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[tweet]1472341060240252928[/tweet]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmmm strange rumour for the sun to start if no truth in it.
They’ve just put a load of names in the article, the Sun has no clue
Hmmm strange rumour for the sun to start if no truth in it.
Hmmm strange rumour for the sun to start if no truth in it.
What's the confusion?
What's the confusion? There is none - there is a rumour (even if it has been started by The S*n). Therefore, since there is a rumour, reporting the existance of the rumour is telling the truth. Cerainly The S*n has it's agenda - as do The Guardian, The Independent, The Daily Ma*l, The Mirror, etc. - they all publish some of the truth, some of the time; some of it heavily slanted towards their agenda. They all survive by slanting the news to reflect and validate the views of their readers.
Of course, the reader's (or the person who refuses to read) will have their own prejudices as to what is true. 'Lib Dems triumph in bye-election'; 'Tories suffer bad bye-election defeat' - both are perfectly true - but nonetheless many will prefer one 'truth' above the other.
I like both of those.