Weststander
Well-known member
Championship
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, against a far lower standard of opponent than DS faces, Bridcutt still rarely scored. Not in their job descriptions.
Championship
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So your happy that our midfield pairing in a season and a half have a goal apiece ?goals wins matches no wonder Murray is under so much pressure in every game . 15 last season 10 this it’s what’s behind him that’s the problem . . It’s ok Keri g Possession buts sometimes u gotta attack . Said before and will again will be gobsmacked if propper and sideways start next season assuming we survive.
Why is interceptions a wierd one? Is it because it doesn’t fit with your narrative? Tell that to Pep, Klopp or Sarri or any other top manager who play with a press. The whole point of a press is to make the other team pass poorly so you can intercept the ball. It’s a massive part of modern football.
And I deliberately listed players who all play for similar level teams and none of them play expansive football (Huddersfield and Fulham?!). And I think you’d be quite lonely amongst football coaches, experts and other teams fans in a group who would take Stephens over any of them.
And I said he was ok on Saturday, poor first half mind you but better second. Against Championship in all but name Huddersfield. That is his standard, I would expect him to play ok in that game. But against the mighty Burnley a couple of weeks ago he was dreadful and culpable for two of their goals.
And finally, why the need to get personal - “beyond help” - when someone has a different opinion to you? I didn’t criticise other fans for their opinion, just laid out a perfectly reasonable explanation of why I don’t think Stephens is a good enough defensive central midfielder in the premier league with stats backing it up. It would suggest to me you’re struggling to back up your opinion.
Yeah brilliant, Stephens could be upgraded for next season, of course he could as could others. Not really relevant now though is it. Our squad is what it is, Stephens is what he is. We can be critical of performances, that someone else could start instead, but what really is the point of judging a player on them being replaced by better next season? We're in this season, it's March, judge, critique, appreciate your team on what they give you now. Your modus operandi just seems to be a perpetual state of disappointment, that I actually feel sorry for you as a fan, because where are you getting your joy from?
It is an interesting statistic though. There isn't a single player from the top 6 clubs in the top 17 interception players. Fernandinho doesn't appear until #37, you go down to #57 until you find a Liverpool player. Dale is only 3 interceptions behind MU's Matic.
Another stat I noticed is that Dale has one of our lowest stats for being dispossessed, with only the defence being dispossessed less times. Dale's figure is just 8 times compared, to say Propper 19, Gross 13, and get this, Bissouma is on 21 already having played 570mins less than DS.
So, I'm not a cheerleader for Dale being one of the top midfielders, but I also know he's pretty decent, does a great job for the team, and played well Saturday. All we can ask of him really. Whether we bring someone else in is the future for me, right now he is the best player for the job he does in this team, this season.
One for the haters: Dale Stephens in acres of space giving the ball away
and one for the lovers: Dale Stephens in acres of space playing a great forward ball
That first clip will fuel the haters, who want DS out of THEIR club.
Yeah brilliant, Stephens could be upgraded for next season, of course he could as could others. Not really relevant now though is it. Our squad is what it is, Stephens is what he is. We can be critical of performances, that someone else could start instead, but what really is the point of judging a player on them being replaced by better next season? We're in this season, it's March, judge, critique, appreciate your team on what they give you now. Your modus operandi just seems to be a perpetual state of disappointment, that I actually feel sorry for you as a fan, because where are you getting your joy from?
That first clip will fuel the haters, who want DS out of THEIR club.
Why is interceptions a wierd one? Is it because it doesn’t fit with your narrative? Tell that to Pep, Klopp or Sarri or any other top manager who play with a press. The whole point of a press is to make the other team pass poorly so you can intercept the ball. It’s a massive part of modern football.
And I deliberately listed players who all play for similar level teams and none of them play expansive football (Huddersfield and Fulham?!). And I think you’d be quite lonely amongst football coaches, experts and other teams fans in a group who would take Stephens over any of them.
And I said he was ok on Saturday, poor first half mind you but better second. Against Championship in all but name Huddersfield. That is his standard, I would expect him to play ok in that game. But against the mighty Burnley a couple of weeks ago he was dreadful and culpable for two of their goals.
And finally, why the need to get personal - “beyond help” - when someone has a different opinion to you? I didn’t criticise other fans for their opinion, just laid out a perfectly reasonable explanation of why I don’t think Stephens is a good enough defensive central midfielder in the premier league with stats backing it up. It would suggest to me you’re struggling to back up your opinion.
.....suggesting he was culpable for two of Burnley's goals, which is pretty funny. Second goal, I remember Stephens getting a foot in and it bouncing fortuitously for their man. Hardly culpable for what followed? Perhaps he should have been stronger in the tackle there, but I'm sure they'd be a gaggle of dunces honing in on him should he have conceded a free kick in that position. You included I dare say.
No. He should have read the move a little bit quicker and made a better interception. It’s what defensive midfielders should be able to do.
He read the move, he was quick enough to get a foot in, it bounced back off McNeil's shin.
Harsh to single out based on the errors that followed, but we all know your stance.
but we all know your stance.
As someone who regularly demonstrates impartiality, open mindedness and objectivity in other threads such as politics and Brexit, if find it disappointing you think I’m biased.
His supposed interception resulted in the ball “bouncing back off” an opponent’s shin. Please, just pause for a minute and think about what you just typed.
As someone who regularly demonstrates impartiality, open mindedness and objectivity in other threads such as politics and Brexit, if find it disappointing you think I’m biased.
Championship
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you think Huddersfield and Fulham play the same way as us? I hope not, so I'll skim over that.
You have picked up on one stat to base your argument on, a narrative that you have changed from your posts some weeks/months ago when you were criticising him for very different things.
It's as if you have reluctantly conceded that he is actually quite decent in his distribution and decided to criticise him on a different front now. You also changed your opinion on how he played on Saturday, gradually through attrition of other posts wearing you down, to ultimately concede he was 'better' in the second half. It's like you are incapable of moving past your bias to give credit where credit is due.
There are players with as many, or fewer interceptions in the PL that are far better than Stephens, similarly there are those with more who I would not replace him with as I stated. It is such a narrow outlook regardless.
What really shows you up is suggesting he was culpable for two of Burnley's goals, which is pretty funny. I'll confess I haven't watched the highlights back since watching the game, but as I recall Barnes played a hopeful nothing ball when pressured on the touchline and Dunk slipped. I'd love to know how he was at fault for that one? Second goal, I remember Stephens getting a foot in and it bouncing fortuitously for their man. Hardly culpable for what followed? Perhaps he should have been stronger in the tackle there, but I'm sure they'd be a gaggle of dunces honing in on him should he have conceded a free kick in that position. You included I dare say.