hahahahaha
"Love him, would be a good signing, yes from me"...etc etc etc
DS signs new 4 year deal.......
"Not good enough, not all that, better players out there, didn't want him anyway" etc etc
**** off Burnley
Stephens staying is great news. Really wondered whether we made the right decision in the summer to keep hold of him but he committed fully to the promotion battle and we've returned that with a four year deal, Premier League football and presumably a decent pay rise. Everyone wins (except Burnley).
"Decent". What do you reckon, a £2m signing on fee payable over time, with a wage rise from £15,000 to £40,000 per week?
The fee is a fraction of the cost of getting a replacement in.
He wont be on 40k a week
Dale & Macauley Stephens.
Blimey anyone would think their parents wanted them bullied.
[tweet]861943948083908609[/tweet]
He wont be on 40k a week
Based on? We had players on £20k a year three years ago.
I'd say he's getting around £35k ish.
Isn't Dunk on 22k? wouldn't of thought Stephens would be on much more than 30k but I don't suppose we will ever know.
No wonder they moved down south and stayed, anyone suggesting he was gagging for a move back north on that basis alone was chuffing idiot.
Strange logic in this one:
Wanted to leave after our interest, refused to sign a new deal and now after they've reached promotion commits to four years. Not the sort of character I'd want based on that.
How about: "Wanted to leave after Burnley's interest, refused to sign a new deal, but knuckled down and utterly professionally played a major part in gaining promotion and after they've reached promotion commits to four years. Exactly the sort of character I'd want based on that".
I can understand them being a bit miffed, but.....
Strange logic in this one:
Wanted to leave after our interest, refused to sign a new deal and now after they've reached promotion commits to four years. Not the sort of character I'd want based on that.
How about: "Wanted to leave after Burnley's interest, refused to sign a new deal, but knuckled down and utterly professionally played a major part in gaining promotion and after they've reached promotion commits to four years. Exactly the sort of character I'd want based on that".
I can understand them being a bit miffed, but.....
Ramierez, Winter is coming.
Fair play and well done to you for persuading him to stay.
I am a little surprised but suspect he must be on a VERY lucrative new deal. He could have probably got a £5 million-plus signing-on deal with Burnley (we were willing to pay £7 million) or another club.
When he slapped in a transfer request last August, perphaps DS wasn't 100% confident you would get promoted?
Would his new 4-year deal contain a release clause?
Fair play and well done to you for persuading him to stay.
I am a little surprised but suspect he must be on a VERY lucrative new deal. He could have probably got a £5 million-plus signing-on deal with Burnley (we were willing to pay £7 million) or another club.
When he slapped in a transfer request last August, perphaps DS wasn't 100% confident you would get promoted?
"Decent". What do you reckon, a £2m signing on fee payable over time, with a wage rise from £15,000 to £40,000 per week?
The fee is a fraction of the cost of getting a replacement in.
He wont be on 40k a week
Based on? We had players on £20k a year three years ago.
I'd say he's getting around £35k ish.
Isn't Dunk on 22k? wouldn't of thought Stephens would be on much more than 30k but I don't suppose we will ever know.