Machiavelli
Well-known member
"You know who's really to blame for that coronavirus? Raheem Sterling."
I don't blame him, but his tattoo, well that's a different matter entirely
"You know who's really to blame for that coronavirus? Raheem Sterling."
"You know who's really to blame for that coronavirus? "
Did the health secretary seriously say this?
Jesus. 1) It’s nothing to do with him 2) cynical distraction.
Well yes he did say it, but he was asked a specific question by Mike Settle from the Herald ........if it was moral for Premier league clubs to refuse to cut the salaries of very highly paid players whilst cutting the wages of non playing staff
Not really cynical distraction when he was just responding to a question and quite a few people are asking why non playing staff at some clubs (spurs for example) are having their wages cut on furlough when the players are not.
Well yes he did say it, but he was asked a specific question by Mike Settle from the Herald ........if it was moral for Premier league clubs to refuse to cut the salaries of very highly paid players whilst cutting the wages of non playing staff
Not really cynical distraction when he was just responding to a question and quite a few people are asking why non playing staff at some clubs (spurs for example) are having their wages cut on furlough when the players are not.
It was an irrelevant and distracting question which he should have addressed accordingly.
Why is there this witch-hunt surrounding players taking wage cuts?
I can understand the argument for players to take cuts to protect the financial position of their CLUBS, but that isn't what the public / media outcry is asking for, presumably?
So let's say Kevin De Bruyne is being paid £200k per week.
If so, he keeps £120k, and about £80k is going in tax to the state, to fund the NHS or whatever else required.
If Kev agrees to the 70% cut I've seen suggested, he'll keep £35k, the state will get £25k, and Sheik Mansour and the Abu Dhabi royal family will save themselves £140k a week.
What exactly are the angry masses trying to achieve?
Whilst everyone focuses on footballers it takes the light off the rich ******** at the top, who da thought
Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk
I would watch it. The mods and clique will be thread banning you for any dissent against the government. ALL HAIL BORIS.
I would watch it. The mods and clique will be thread banning you for any dissent against the government. ALL HAIL BORIS.
Been called worse by a mod and others this week already.
I would watch it. The mods and clique will be thread banning you for any dissent against the government. ALL HAIL BORIS.
Twit.
The problem with your comment is that PL footballers ARE the rich people at the top. How else would you describe someone on £70k a week?
Things might be changing yes. This is all I can freely say.
I am not setting out to do anything. Just giving an opinion. What is wrong with that? I am sorry if you think it is the wrong one.
What am I to do?