I'm trying to go and walk the dogs!I'll get some shit for this but here goes...
I've followed cycling since '87 and seen plenty of doping scandals, suspicious performances etc but I'm still watching it, reading about it all these years later. Perhaps, me and 'fans' like me are part of the 'problem'.
There seems to be massive delight in trying to take Armstrong down with most of the noise coming from America and people who were probably turned on to cycling by Armstrong itself. With all the revelations in recent days from Jonathan Vaughters and Tyler Hamilton - America must be one, if not THE dirtiest nations when it comes to doping in cycling and they're newcomers ffs. Is / has any US cyclist been clean?
And while all this is going on, people are raving about the Vuelta. No doubt, its a great race but jeez, for me this is the biggest 'eye brow raiser' i've ever seen. Its right up there with the Gewiss 1-2-3's of the mid-90's. Utterly bonkers. Contador's served a ban and Valverede is pretty unrepentent about his doping too and as for Rodriguez....
I'll watch it this afternoon and enjoy it but i'll be keeping an open mind on these 'performances'.
It would be nice if those seemingly obsessed with nailing Armstrong would also do the same although for many theres good dopers and bad dopers
Sorry - 'rant' over!
carry on...
First, I think the USA are the dirtiest in all sport, not just cycling.
I believe in the current doping controls, which helps me to believe in the sport.
I don't believe in the people at the top of cycling.
If Lance-gate were to sweep the Pat McQuaid's of the cycling world, away, it would almost all be worth it.
I always think I'm 1 scandal away from packing the whole lot in.
This Vuelta has clearly be designed for a Spanish 1-2-3, and that's what they've got.
The stage distances are down, and so are the times (except yesterday).
Your right about being unrepentant, that certainly is tough to justify, and doesn't help the cause, in the long run.
Viva la GB.