[Palace] Crystal Palace are definitely staying up. Definitely.

[oneillco]

Checks thread title.....

Yep it's def about palace.

Yes and this is definitely a BHAFC fans site; not sure why you would imagine that we are interested in what you have to say. Try that Grimsdale fan site or whatever it's called. I certainly wouldn't bother going on it as I have no interest in caravans or train spotting.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

...

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Lol.

Don't even support palace you mong

 

[Dick Head]

Don't get why that's funny?!

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Dead link

 

[Dick Head]

Dead link

nope

 

[oneillco]

Lol.

Don't even support palace you mong

Oh sorry, as you are obviously not very intelligent I assumed you were called Nigel and lived in a caravan

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Dear [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION].

Please can the FFS Parr emoticon be replaced with FFS Puncheon's epic facepalm?

Rather than replaced, can we have both?

 

[Dougie]

Oh sorry, as you are obviously not very intelligent I assumed you were called Nigel and lived in a caravan

I would say a " nigel " sounds quite intelligent and would most certainly NOT live in a caravan .

 

[Goldstone Rapper]

I would say a " nigel " sounds quite intelligent and would most certainly NOT live in a caravan .

But many intelligent people live in caravans, such as Danny The Champion of the World and his loving dad.

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

Completely outplayed spurs yesterday.

Should have won

That's a very one sided view to take. All the reports I've read say palace were on top first half but spurs were far better in the second.

Not got a vested interest in being controversial have you?

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Lol.

Don't even support palace you mong

But you are a Spurs fan equivalent of [MENTION=2608]vulture[/MENTION]

 

[EDS]

This thread was made worth it by more of Soggy's hilarious one liners

 

[ThePaddy]

They were second to bottom when Pulis took over. They are now bottom. Go Tony!

Stoke and Hull in the next two games. Great opportunity for 6 points.

Sign a decent striker to play with Chamakh and we stay up, no doubt. It's all we're missing - if we had a goalscorer on the pitch we'd have been 3 goals up after 30 minutes yesterday.

 

[dadams2k11]

Stoke and Hull in the next two games. Great opportunity for 6 points.

Sign a decent striker to play with Chamakh and we stay up, no doubt. It's all we're missing - if we had a goalscorer on the pitch we'd have been 3 goals up after 30 minutes yesterday.

Hang on, Chamakh was the best thing since sliced bread a few weeks ago when he scored 3 in 3. What's up with him now?

 

[Dougie]

Hang on, Chamakh was the best thing since sliced bread a few weeks ago when he scored 3 in 3. What's up with him now?

Nothing , he's a great player and key to our survival hopes .

 

[Triggaaar]

Sign a decent striker to play with Chamakh and we stay up, no doubt.

No doubt? Well that's it then, you're safe. Because if that's all you need, there's no way you wouldn't spend well over £15 to guarantee survival. Strange that you're favourites to go down.

It's all we're missing - if we had a goalscorer on the pitch we'd have been 3 goals up after 30 minutes yesterday.

Who in your team, even had 3 shots in the first 30 minutes? That's right, no one. So it would be some striker to be scoring you 3 goals without even having 3 chances.

 

[ThePaddy]

Hang on, Chamakh was the best thing since sliced bread a few weeks ago when he scored 3 in 3. What's up with him now?

Nothing at all. He's absolutely fantastic. We need someone to play with him, as I said.

 

[ThePaddy]

Who in your team, even had 3 shots in the first 30 minutes? That's right, no one. So it would be some striker to be scoring you 3 goals without even having 3 chances.

I'm afraid you're wrong. Puncheon had 3 shots in the first half hourish and Cameron Jerome had a few chances in addition to his shots where a better striker would have made contact and scored. I can only assume that you didn't watch the game and decided to make things up to compensate for this. Had you watched the game you would have seen that we were in complete control in the first half and should have gone in at half time well ahead, as many of the Palace & Spurs players pointed out.

 

[Triggaaar]

I'm afraid you're wrong.

I'm not. Puncheon's third shot was after 30 minutes. And the few minutes aside, the two non penalty shots he had were both from outside the box, and one of them was blocked. But you say you'd have been 3 up if you had a goalscorer. Deluded.

Puncheon had 3 shots in the first half hourish and Cameron Jerome had a few chances in addition to his shots where a better striker would have made contact and scored.

If you had a better striker on the pitch, presumably replacing Puncheon, he couldn't have also taken Jerome's chances, it doesn't work like that.

I can only assume that you didn't watch the game and decided to make things up to compensate for this. Had you watched the game you would have seen that we were in complete control in the first half and should have gone in at half time well ahead, as many of the Palace & Spurs players pointed out.

I didn't say that you couldn't have gone in ahead had your players been better (well duh) - you said you would have been 3 up after 30 minutes with a goalscorer on the pitch - that's a long way from what Palace and Spurs players said. You're deluded.