Marshy
Well-known member
The article sounds very ominous.
Better get a good fee.
Better get a good fee.
I don't think it's Crofts fault, I'm just saying it would be nice to see people being consistent. If this was EXACTLY the same story but Murray's name inserted for Crofts, this thread would be full of
"good riddance"
"northern w*nker"
"lazy and sh*t"
"disloyal"
etc.
Eh!?!?!?
So Calderon leaves, and he gets all sorts of abuse. Our captain leaves, and he gets an appreciation thread. Bizzare.
From a few that have never rate(d) Murray. Expect the same sort of responses on here later when a few of the more 'colourful' characters come on and how Crofts floated few games and will not be missed
Calderon f***ing us about might have something to do with it.
Eh!?!?!?
So Calderon leaves, and he gets all sorts of abuse. Our captain leaves, and he gets an appreciation thread. Bizzare.
He hasn't even left yet, has he
He hasn't even left yet, has he
By asking for some more time because he couldn't arrange a meeting in time? Close season now, Crofts is under contract so he has allllll the time in the world to decide/meet.
Yes. Calderon agreed to our deal verbally and then changed has mind because Southampton *might* make an offer. Crofts is under contract and it's down to us to accept an offer. That is somewhat different.
By asking for some more time because he couldn't arrange a meeting in time? Close season now, Crofts is under contract so he has allllll the time in the world to decide/meet.
Oh had he verbally agreed?
In that case, it is different. If he had said he would consider all options, then moved, that's fine. But if he verbally agreed then well, that's a schoolboy error.