Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 10,919
We've never been thick, sad, needy, desperate, tinpot, mistaken or foolish enough to suggest we have a world class player, but what is a reasonable definition?
When I spoke to a chap at work about this, he suggested that if a player is in the top 3 of his position globally that would do it. I think that's a wee bit restrictive. Maybe 'top 5' is a bit fairer.
Any other suggestions or comments?
When I spoke to a chap at work about this, he suggested that if a player is in the top 3 of his position globally that would do it. I think that's a wee bit restrictive. Maybe 'top 5' is a bit fairer.
Any other suggestions or comments?