Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Had cool hair and a song after him. More than many we have now. Running with tippy-tappy steps must count for something.
30+ Championship goals even over that time frame would suggest he was Championship quality albeit nowhere near top level.
Those 30 goals came despite playing for a relegated team and for us often isolated and rarely playing to strengths.
Had cool hair and a song after him. More than many we have now. Running with tippy-tappy steps must count for something.
Opportunities in a system that didn't suit him. He'd have done very well in the team we have now.
Opportunities in a league that didn't suit him, more like.
08/09 League 1 P'boro played 53 scored 26
09/10 Championship P'boro played 47 scored 11
10/11 League 1 P'boro played 56 scored 35
11/12 Championship B'ton played 50 scored 10
12/13 Championship B'ton played 31 scored 11
Pretty conclusive that League 1 was his level. Surely you're not claiming that Posh changed their tactics in 09/10 and then changed them back the year after?
I got loads of grief when I stated that he was basically Alex Revell mk2 but I was proved right.
I think that's pretty conclusive proof that he was too good for League 1 and OK at Championship level.
That's the point I'm making, he was nowhere near good enough to be absolute top level but I saw enough of him pre injury and before Poyet's tactics impacted his confidence to know he could have been a decent Championship player rather than average at best.
Also remember Posh went from scoring 100+ goals in league 1 to a relegation fight against better opposition it's quite natural his goals per game ratio would drop as a result.
Also remember Posh went from scoring 100+ goals in league 1 to a relegation fight against better opposition it's quite natural his goals per game ratio would drop as a result.
Opportunities in a league that didn't suit him, more like.
08/09 League 1 P'boro played 53 scored 26
09/10 Championship P'boro played 47 scored 11
10/11 League 1 P'boro played 56 scored 35
11/12 Championship B'ton played 50 scored 1067
12/13 Championship B'ton played 31 scored 11
Pretty conclusive that League 1 was his level. Surely you're not claiming that Posh changed their tactics in 09/10 and then changed them back the year after?
I got loads of grief when I stated that he was basically Alex Revell mk2 but I was proved right.
Seems reasonable to me. Beats the 12 goals Murray got for us.Opportunities in a league that didn't suit him, more like.
08/09 League 1 P'boro played 53 scored 26
Not too bad for a first season in the Championship, despite being in a relegated side.09/10 Championship P'boro played 47 scored 11
Lots more than Murray got. Looks good.10/11 League 1 P'boro played 56 scored 35
While Murray got 7 from 43.11/12 Championship B'ton played 50 scored 10
Yep, he couldn't fit into Poyet's style. Still, 11 from 29 Championship games is hardly the worst record.12/13 Championship B'ton played 31 scored 11
It certainly isn't.Pretty conclusive that League 1 was his level.
Square peg in a round hole here
Seems reasonable to me. Beats the 12 goals Murray got for us.
Not too bad for a first season in the Championship, despite being in a relegated side.
Lots more than Murray got. Looks good.
While Murray got 7 from 43.
Yep, he couldn't fit into Poyet's style. Still, 11 from 29 Championship games is hardly the worst record.
It certainly isn't.
Anyway it's good that some of our fans thought CMS was better value than Murray, can't see it myself.
Does anyone really believe that?l.
What that shows is that a player could go from 6 goals (or whatever it was) in a season to 30. If Murray had been badly injured after his first year with Palace then people would look back and say it's been proven that he wasn't good enough for the Championship. Buzzer was trying to show that CMS wasn't good enough, but I just highlighted that he did better than Murray a lot of the time, and we don't know how a fit CMS would have done in a team like ours.Love the way you have deliberately omitted the comparison the season that Murray got Palace promoted with his goals. How selective is that!
Do they? I've never seen anyone say that.Anyway it's good that some of our fans thought CMS was better value than Murray
What that shows is that a player could go from 6 goals (or whatever it was) in a season to 30. If Murray had been badly injured after his first year with Palace then people would look back and say it's been proven that he wasn't good enough for the Championship. Buzzer was trying to show that CMS wasn't good enough, but I just highlighted that he did better than Murray a lot of the time, and we don't know how a fit CMS would have done in a team like ours.
Do they? I've never seen anyone say that.
Plenty here would have said the same about Barnes, but they can't now as he's proved them wrong. CMS can't prove anyone wrong now. He wasn't good enough to play as a lone target man, he didn't have the all round game to fit to our system. But if he (prior to injury) was in the team we have now, up front with Murray, he'd do well.My eyes told me CMS wasn't good enough at out level when he was here. A striker with terrible ball control is not good enough for a team trying to get promoted out of the Championship imo. Forget after the injury, he wasn't good enough before it, again I am talking about what my eyes saw.
I think a lot of the criticism of CMS is unjustified. He was playing for a mentally arthritic manager who's sides invariably took 20 minutes to get the ball to the halfway line, thus making it impossible for us to capitalise on his pace. I believe that CMS was worth the money when we bought him. You wouldn't buy a Ferrari and refuse to put petrol in it, would you?
Seems reasonable to me. Beats the 12 goals Murray got for us.
Not too bad for a first season in the Championship, despite being in a relegated side.
Lots more than Murray got. Looks good.
While Murray got 7 from 43.
Yep, he couldn't fit into Poyet's style. Still, 11 from 29 Championship games is hardly the worst record.
It certainly isn't.
Opportunities in a system that didn't suit him. He'd have done very well in the team we have now.