It looks like Tahir is injured.
Who says he's injured? He got kicked off by the umpires for running on the wicket.That explains why Carberry only bowled 3 deliveries.
It looks like Tahir is injured.
Who says he's injured? He got kicked off by the umpires for running on the wicket.That explains why Carberry only bowled 3 deliveries.
Who says he's injured? He got kicked off by the umpires for running on the wicket.
Who says he's injured? He got kicked off by the umpires for running on the wicket.
I was wondering why the score was progressing but I've noticed that Cork has been removed from the attack. Lovely gesture by Hants, offering to make a game of it.
As I am following it via a desktop scorecard, rather than having the commentary on (boss does not see the funny side of that), the fact he did not complete the over, meant I pressumed he was injured. Either way if he is not allowed to bowl in the innings that is fine.
Apologies for upsetting you and all those around you.
slight over reaction me thinks...
I know, what is wrong with a bit of running on the wicket?
No worries, I wasn't paying a lot of attention, and got confused when I read here he was injured.I take it you are listening to commentary? I am only following on Cricinfo, that sort of information is not supplied. I assume UB maybe doing the same, hence why we've come to those conclusions?
Apology accepted. My family will rally round, and we'll get through this.Apologies for upsetting you and all those around you.
Eh? We have no chance. 121/4