Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Could this be plan B



ditchy

a man with a sound track record as a source of qua
Jul 8, 2003
5,249
brighton
Huge office complex set for edge of city
By Lawrence Marzouk
A derelict farm site on the outskirts of Brighton is to be redeveloped as a regional HQ for a major company.

The Argus understands that the front-runner is a Brighton-based business looking to relocate in the city.

A well-placed source suggested last night that Lloyds TSB, currently based in Gloucester Place, Brighton, which employs 1,800 people in the city, was in the running.

advertisement
But a spokesman for the bank was unable to comment when contacted.

Patcham Court Farm, at the junction of the A23 and A27, has been vacant for 15 years and was the proposed site for a new park-and-ride scheme.

The proposal was eventually rejected by councillors last year and if, as expected, the office scheme is given the green light next week it will rule out any future plans for a similar project on site.

The council is set to reconsider park-and-ride options after the May elections and will trawl through previously proposed sites, including land at Braypool.

Last November an international marketing campaign was launched to find a suitor for the land, attracting 26 bids.

Offers ranged from £1 million to £5 million and the council's policy and resources committee will next week decide which package to accept.

The proposed development, which has been recommended by officers, is a high-quality office complex with two and three storey buildings and 180 car spaces.

Unlike the previous park-and-ride scheme, the project will not involve building on nearby allotments and houses.

Selection criteria included money offered, design, credibility and track record of the developer, funding and benefits to the city.

The leading developer has already secured an agreement for a major company to move into the offices.

Council leader Simon Burgess said: "The offer we're considering looks like a really good deal for the city.

"It is particularly good that the developer has a big client ready to move in so the whole site and building won't stand empty with 'to let' boards up for a long period.

"It gives local taxpayers a good return on the sale of this public asset.

"Better still, it boosts the local economy by becoming the site of hundreds of jobs for local people."

Councillor Bill Randall, who sits on the policy and resources committee, said building offices was a missed opportunity.

The Green councillor has pushed for the site to become a Community Land Trust, a non-for-profit organisation which buys land for the benefit of the community to build affordable housing and communal facilities.

He said: "It is a missed opportunity but I cannot attack it if it is going to bring jobs to the city."

The policy committee will consider the plan on March 29 at Hove Town Hall. If councillors agree to sell the land, the developer would still need to secure planning permission from the council for the scheme.
 




MOWTCHOPS

Banned
Feb 17, 2007
267
Would that have the same access problems that beset Waterhall ?
 


Bevendean Hillbilly

New member
Sep 4, 2006
12,805
Nestling in green nowhere
offers ranging between £1 million and £5 million..the council will decide which one to proceed with...erm..I wonder which bid will be successful?

???
 


Mendoza

NSC's Most Stalked
Lloyds have been looking to relocate for a while.

They have 4 massive offices in Brighton, but want to move to one big one. They had an ambitious one to buy out the AMEX building, but it fell through.

I think they want one huge call centre, as they have recently moved lots of work to Andover and Bangalore
 


ali jenkins

Thanks to Guinness Dave
Feb 9, 2006
9,896
Southwick
The only problem with waterhall is the fact thats is on the wrong side of the By-Pass.

And im pretty sure that the farm site would be too small.
 




hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,730
Chandlers Ford
ali jenkins said:
The only problem with waterhall is the fact thats is on the wrong side of the By-Pass.

And im pretty sure that the farm site would be too small.

That wasn't the only problem. Transport was a major issue.
First the trains - there is no station. To us laymen, the fact that a train line runs alongside it seems helpful, but it seems that building a halt there was considered unviable, so no train link.

As for roads, the only current access to Waterhall is under the railway bridge in Mill Road. The highways agency apparently quoshed any suggestions of a slip road off the A27 [as they also did with Toads Hole.
 


ali jenkins

Thanks to Guinness Dave
Feb 9, 2006
9,896
Southwick
hans kraay fan club said:
That wasn't the only problem. Transport was a major issue.
First the trains - there is no station. To us laymen, the fact that a train line runs alongside it seems helpful, but it seems that building a halt there was considered unviable, so no train link.

As for roads, the only current access to Waterhall is under the railway bridge in Mill Road. The highways agency apparently quoshed any suggestions of a slip road off the A27 [as they also did with Toads Hole.


Im sure i heard somewhere that it wouldnt cost much, and wouldnt be too hard to put a little siding with a platform at Waterhall only to be used on match days, and Mill Road could be used as parking and the same park and ride sites that are going to be used for falmer could be used.

Its all pointless anyway because the council wont let us build it there due to planning laws.
 


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,754
at home
hans kraay fan club said:
That wasn't the only problem. Transport was a major issue.
First the trains - there is no station. To us laymen, the fact that a train line runs alongside it seems helpful, but it seems that building a halt there was considered unviable, so no train link.

As for roads, the only current access to Waterhall is under the railway bridge in Mill Road. The highways agency apparently quoshed any suggestions of a slip road off the A27 [as they also did with Toads Hole.


It wasnt unvialble, it was that legislation is such following I think it was hatfield, that staions or "halts" are not allowed to be built in close proximity to two tunnells.

patcham Court farm was one of the original Archer/Bellotti sites for the new Goldstone...if only the council would have been in agreement, we could be playing there now
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here