Yeh but for some strange reason, I thought the Coronation was on Monday too - thus the extra bank holidayThe match is on Monday.
Yeh but for some strange reason, I thought the Coronation was on Monday too - thus the extra bank holidayThe match is on Monday.
It'll be my first round since some fairly major surgery, so it might be a very short round indeed.Or how long it'll take him to get round
I like history, but I also like the pageantry and military aspect of it.
I’ll go in the kitchen to make coffee when the consort gets ‘done’.
Can I just say I’m a bit nervousJust an observation TB but I suspect the Venn diagram for those who love Royalty, but don't like Camilla or Megan, who by definition are 'royal' would be quite interesting.
But at the end of the day I simply find it very hard to believe, that with all the various shenanigans of the last 1200 odd years, that the individual claiming to be King Charles III is actually the rightful bloodline heir, and it is far more likely to be some string vested 'Rab C Nesbitt' type out in the Australian outback that we should be pledging our allegiance to (for those who want to) instead
You don’t mention Mary Berry….. why ?Or Dench, Attenborough or Fry?
Who says we have to have <insert politician you don't like> as a president? A ceremonial apolitical presidential alternative would be fantastic IMO. But we live in a world where 2 thirds of this country are happy enough with injustice so bad that senior royals get away with suspected noncing, fraud, using the RAF as a personal taxi service and so on - because they're scared of losing an unelected head of state.
I'm bored of the argument. If Andrew's conduct isn't enough to make people see the injustice of lack of accountability, then nothing is.