Yes, those crazy policies like nationalising the railways, last time I checked supported by over 70% of the population.You must be mad if you believe in his policies, mad I tell ye.
Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk
Yes, those crazy policies like nationalising the railways, last time I checked supported by over 70% of the population.You must be mad if you believe in his policies, mad I tell ye.
Yes and they wake up remember all the strikes in the past. If the Lewes Uckfield line is to ever happen it will be private investment not public money,which would be fantastic for East Sussex and the Albion.Yes, those crazy policies like nationalising the railways, last time I checked supported by over 70% of the population.
Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk
Yes, because there haven't been any problems with strikes on the "privatised" railways recently, have there? Doh!Yes and they wake up remember all the strikes in the past. If the Lewes Uckfield line is to ever happen it will be private investment not public money,which would be fantastic for East Sussex and the Albion.
Yes and they wake up remember all the strikes in the past. If the Lewes Uckfield line is to ever happen it will be private investment not public money,which would be fantastic for East Sussex and the Albion.
The private railways under the Tories have been a shambles, and at the tax payers expense. Imagine if labour had been in power while the southern strikes had been on-going, they'd have been slated for it.
The private railways under the Tories have been a shambles, and at the tax payers expense. Imagine if labour had been in power while the southern strikes had been on-going, they'd have been slated for it.
If not two jabs two jags Diane Abbot could do a job.
Which leaders of which railway union? And what exactly did they say?Didint the leaders of the railway Union say they wanted to bring the goverment down they would let its members suffer while they try and achieve its political objectives.