Sounds a piece of piss. Pleased to hear these poor families will be sorted tomorrow. It will be tomorrow, right?
Whether or not it is a good idea, your sarcasm at this present time seems a little misplaced!!!
Sounds a piece of piss. Pleased to hear these poor families will be sorted tomorrow. It will be tomorrow, right?
Sounds a piece of piss. Pleased to hear these poor families will be sorted tomorrow. It will be tomorrow, right?
Precisely this. We don't have nearly enough social housing and little or no affordable housing for private purchase here in the South and it desperately needs looking at. Maybe a radical change in the law is needed for property speculation which certainly aggravates the problems. I honestly have little sympathy for those property speculators who live elsewhere and who have houses bought purely for profit and not being rented but sitting empty.
If a law is brought in that encourages them to sell or rent it out or have the potential for it being borrowed for 6 months, once every 3 years then maybe that might change things. Alternatively, make the council tax surcharge much, much bigger. It probably won't stop buyers at the high end of the market but it might deter speculators who are buying up houses that would otherwise be bought by the average bod.
I think things should change and maybe this is the time to start looking at it.
Agree with all of that. My point was only that I doubt anything could be done with regard to vacant privately-owned housing stock to help the poor families displaced in the Grenfell Tower tragedy.
Sounds a piece of piss. Pleased to hear these poor families will be sorted tomorrow. It will be tomorrow, right?
I just want something rare to happen. I want to see our PM and Government hand in hand with the other parties to make strong and right decisions now. No expense spared, no wishy washy words, no lessons will be learnt, strong leadership and decision making, this is a chance for politicians to show us what good they can do.
No political point scoring but its hugely disappointing that May did not meet a single resident, after the election this was chance to show that she is she can engage and she is not the belligerent person she seems to be and she is going to change and she still ballsed it up.
Precisely this. We don't have nearly enough social housing and little or no affordable housing for private purchase here in the South and it desperately needs looking at. Maybe a radical change in the law is needed for property speculation which certainly aggravates the problems. I honestly have little sympathy for those property speculators who live elsewhere and who have houses bought purely for profit and not being rented but sitting empty.
If a law is brought in that encourages them to sell or rent it out or have the potential for it being borrowed for 6 months, once every 3 years then maybe that might change things. Alternatively, make the council tax surcharge much, much bigger. It probably won't stop buyers at the high end of the market but it might deter speculators who are buying up houses that would otherwise be bought by the average bod.
I think things should change and maybe this is the time to start looking at it.
If May had met residents, she'd be criticised for not seeing victims in hospital. If she saw victims in hospital, she'd be criticised for not rescuing people from the inferno on Wednesday night. In certain quarters she can't win right now, with some justifiability, but not all.
with the yield from rents far more than you can get elsewhere, i believe the scale of this issue is greatly overstated. i recall the total reported empty properties in London is ~0.5% and thats including all those awaiting renovation. the number going empty for years is down to single digit thousands. that might be enough for the displaced from Grenfell, but they arent going to necessarily be in the immediate area as some politicans seem to think. after renting, the wealthy are more likley to keep a property as a peid-a-terre for occasional visits, rather like we might buy a villa in the Med. social housing needs to be addressed with real policy reform to build more properties, and more land is available so prices can moderate.
with the yield from rents far more than you can get elsewhere, i believe the scale of this issue is greatly overstated. i recall the total reported empty properties in London is ~0.5% and thats including all those awaiting renovation. the number going empty for years is down to single digit thousands. that might be enough for the displaced from Grenfell, but they arent going to necessarily be in the immediate area as some politicans seem to think. after renting, the wealthy are more likley to keep a property as a peid-a-terre for occasional visits, rather like we might buy a villa in the Med. social housing needs to be addressed with real policy reform to build more properties, and more land is available so prices can moderate.
As much as it would clearly be a lovely thing to do, it's just not practical in terms of this particular tragedy is it? Why? Well how about...
1. How do you determine which properties have been empty for long enough? Seriously - how would anyone know?
2. Where do you draw the line between "Empty for too long" and "Empty but not enough so we can't reclaim the property"?
3. What if an "Empty for too long" property owners are returning tomorrow? Or the day after? Or next week? Where do they go when they can't live in the property they legally own?
There may be a wide-scale problem here, but I'm not sure how it can be rectified in the immediate vicinity of the disaster in the very short timescales required, as much as is sounds great to propose putting some of these poor people in multi-million pound properties.
You could be onto something. Anyone with a long-time vacant property (say 3 years) that isn't or wasn't their main residence might find that it gets requisitioned for max of say, 6 months in a 3 year period. Put measures in place so that say, old people in long-term care or those working abroad don't get caught out. Could work.
People still slagging off Jeremy whilst May continues to cut all our services? Some absolute morons on here it's truly shocking.
Please don't ban me again, I know the truth hurts sometimes.And that isn't equally moronic?
Regardless of one's political leanings, the extent of foreign ownership of property in the UK, especially London (and within that Kensington being particularly attractive) is scary.
Many of these properties are vacant, simply because the owners, who are frequently nameplate companies registered in tax havens, use them as a store of wealth, rather than as a dwelling.
Take a look at the Private Eye map of foreign ownership, note the prices of the properties, and ask yourself how did we let this happen?
https://suemarcar.carto.com/viz/9fc804fa-4b6b-11e5-a73d-0e0c41326911/embed_map
Obviously it's an idea that comes with some practical challenges but really, it's got to be worth exploring?
Peoples reactions to this tell a story about their outlook, some will say why not, let's get it done. Others will leap in straight away and tell us why it can't be done.
It's also what differentiates those in life (and in business) who see opportunities and get things done with those who do not.