- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,778
Thanks for the fair and reasoned response, I totally respect that you've run companies and being software houses kind of joins the dots here!
I agree the issue is political, but the proof of wrongdoing will be technical. If they've released the source code of the app there really should be a smoking gun by now.
If anything the big issue here is the thing Tories are usually accused of - handing big contacts to their mates without a tendering process but everyone's forgotten about that to make Cummings the target.
With regards to functionality, that's what the current testing phase is for Shirley?
Releasing the source code will show what what the app does locally and the data passed to the centre, but I believe the centralised solution that has been built pulling all the data to a central source, as opposed to the de-centralised where the data is only held locally on the device is what people are having an issue with. I think it's the central holding of all data that some people are concerned about with regards to data integrity, security and protection/uses, but this isn't my issue.
I'm not really bothered what technical solution is chosen, but it seems strange to me, not to go with a pre-existing one backed by major suppliers if it does the key requirement of tracking and tracing.
A long time ago, working for a large financial institution, the first thing I did when I arrived was to cut a large expensive project assessing which was the best word processor on the market. I gave them 3 days to assess an early Microsoft Word (this was many years ago!) and told them that if it did everything we required, that was what we were buying.
The decision wasn't technical, it was political as I knew that MS word would be developed and supported for the next 10+ years (30+ years later the decision is proven !). This is the same. We need a proven track and trace we can roll out ASAP. Everything else is just pointless noise.
I believe introducing Faculty and co has done absolutely nothing to achieve this and has, in fact, done the opposite. It was a poor political decision on a number of levels.
Last edited: