brighton fella
New member
- Mar 20, 2009
- 1,645
- Thread starter
- #341
WTC7 Debunked;
I thought your type refuse to rely on youtube videos.
WTC7 Debunked;
The collapse made the old 7 World Trade Center the first tall building known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires, and the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed due to fire.
Wow, what were the chances of that?!
Yes that's what CTers like to claim but apart from this one
Yes that's what CTers like to claim but apart from this one
And it didn't even have a 767 fly into it at 500mph.
This article will explain where you are going wrong in your thought process
http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm
it was a copy and paste from wiki, not my writing.
It does need to be said though, You do care a lot about what people think don't you? Even the writer of that wiki page!
Does Marijuana play a strong part in your life by any chance?
Wasn't there a clause in the ground lease which meant if the ground was sold, all proceeds would go to the Albion?
wasn't this what Bellotti and Archer fiddled with?
I could be wrong?
hang on a minute, aren't you religiously against youtube videos being used as evidence for anything?
its you whose encouraged me to not trust youtube videos, why are you now resorting to using them?
What's happened to you!? have you been bitten by a CT recently?
I thought your type refuse to rely on youtube videos.
I just love the FURY of CT's when people don't believe their nutty bullshit. You can almost hear them stamping their feet.
yes a fire just like the 7 building but no sign of a collapse.
This article will explain where you are going wrong in your thought process
http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm
i presume from your anger you have read the article and realised you are being a plum
that's b*llocks these buildings were designed to withstand that scale of impact.
that's b*llocks these buildings were designed to withstand that scale of impact.
No, it is a useless, childish and moronic answer. Par for the course I suppose.not like you..is that a fair enough answer.
I don't think you are correct there.
They were designed to withstand an impact by a plane though.
Grrrrrr, Im getting so angry (as you can spot). Wish i hadn't watched that video grrr!!!
They were designed to withstand impact from the biggest plane in the word at that time when the building was built (1973 i think)