Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 9,120
Selling Ulloa would be a colossal mistake, giving him some company upfront however, is a fine idea.
I know. It makes me wonder at the relative sanity of some.
So we are now supposed to take into account how first team players will react if we sign some competition? Really?
Unless you have been watching Sheffield Wednesday I'm not sure how you know he's not as good. He's younger and was signed for 4 times the amount we paid for Ulloa, i'd suggest there is a good chance he's even better personally.
YES we definately need to take into account how contracted Brighton players will react when signing other players. Escpecially loan players that potentially will replace them in the side !
Your right he must be better then if he cost 4 times as much...
!
Your right he must be better then if he cost 4 times as much...
1. You don't know it would be a loan.
2. You don't know if Leo and Wickham would play together.
Other than that, do carry on.
No, no you're right that he's not as good even though you've never seen him play
If...... its a buy.... which i dont beleive it is then i would be delighted to add Wickham to the squad, I have already said that.
And all I am going on is that we have played 1 up front for the last 3 years, there is nothng to suggest this will change.
And as far as I am aware Wickham has been nothing other than a down the middle centre forward the whole of his career.
I fail to see where at present he will fit into the side, other than fitting him into a left sided role of a front 3 which I dont believe is his position.
I think we have yet to see what Oscar will do with our 4-3-3. To repeat, this is why I am excited by CMS's return. I honestly believe he will play WITH Leo. Wickham? Who knows? But, you are assuming too much when you say his arrival WOULD p1ss Leo off.
If...... its a buy.... which i dont beleive it is then i would be delighted to add Wickham to the squad, I have already said that.
And all I am going on is that we have played 1 up front for the last 3 years, there is nothng to suggest this will change.
And as far as I am aware Wickham has been nothing other than a down the middle centre forward the whole of his career.
I fail to see where at present he will fit into the side, other than fitting him into a left sided role of a front 3 which I dont believe is his position.
Competition for places is what every successful club needs.you dont think it will piss Leo off if hes not in the side ?, and In my opinion Wickham can only play Leo's role.
IF he can play a wide role with Leo then I would be delighted.
But we have had a shift in formation, we started the season with numerous attempts to get Buckley playing more centrally 'off' Ulloa.Maybe, but nothing indcates a shift in team formation. A system that is working very well, and has done for the last 3 years.
Wickham will only come on loan if he is guaranteed a start, and that for me finishes the career of Ulloa with us.
Why do I keep hearing wickham is only loan? In return for bridcutt and bucker?
Why do I keep hearing wickham is only loan? In return for bridcutt and bucker?
Why do I keep hearing wickham is only loan? In return for bridcutt and bucker?