West Hoathly Seagull
Honorary Ruffian
The trouble with trams is they cost a fortune to deliver. Politicians love them because they are seen as shiny, new and innovative AND ARE NOT BUSES. Trouble is, buses can carry just as many punters, if not more, are a damn site more flexible in there routing and cost a massive amount less.
Rapid Transit is great, but it does not have to be trams. There are dozens of examples worldwide of bus rapid transit, delivered a a fraction of the cost of a Croydon Tramlink or similar.
I think you will find politicians don't particularly like trams. The Government refused Leeds and Liverpool the right to build schemes. Liverpool are now trying again; Leeds has opted for trolleybuses. I still think my point about buses being seen as a lower class form of transport is valid. I don't agree with it; as I have said above, I happily use the bus when in London - the 507 from Victoria was a godsend when I was ill earlier in the year and could hardly walk, but the figures (I don't have them but look in railway and light rail magazines) bear my point out. Of course trams are probably not suitable in Brighton, unless you ban cars (and delivery vans, which would be far more difficult) from large parts of the centre. I can think of only two roads they could possibly share with cars - the seafront and the Steine. However, it must now seem an error to have got rid of Brighton's trams. Sydney is desperately trying to put back as many as possible, having got rid of nearly all of its - how many people know that the Opera House was built on an old tram depot? It has a very extensive bus service, but most locals drive, whereas Melbourne, which has kept its trams, sees far higher public transport use in the centre.
Because of the limited capacity at Withdean, the service needed subsidy. Get a decent sized car park (or three) and P&R will have the chance to take off. Every car parked at a park and ride site is one less vehicle cluttering up the city centre streets.
I think it has to be park and ride to stop visitors driving in. What you have to remember is that not everyone visiting is going to be coming in on a direct public transport route. Okay, you have the 17 to Henfield and Horsham, and the 29 to Lewes and Tunbridge Wells, but say you want to go from Groombridge to Brighton - far less easy. I generally only go to Withdean and generally do not go into the middle of Brighton that often. Quite honestly it is too much hassle. I prefer to go by train, but that means paying at least £6 to park in Haywards Heath, or attempting to find somewhere near Three Bridges - not easy once the commuters have taken all the spaces. A convenient park and ride and reasonable bus fare might make the difference. I am presuming that HB and B does not want to pay to subsidise bus services for visitors. Fine - bring in a scheme that is profitable. That would mean restrictions on driving in to central Brighton. It is now practically impossible to drive into the centre of Oxford, but the place is always bursting with people.