Dan Aitch
New member
- May 31, 2013
- 2,287
This is an easy one to resolve, whether you agree with my perspective or not (and I've expressed it before).
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include sexual orientation. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their sexual orientation.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include gender. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their gender.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include race/ethnicity. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their race/ethnicity.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include religion/belief. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their religion/belief.
I could continue and list all of the protected characteristics but what would be the point? The simple truth is that the Equality Act has not created a sliding-scale; has not decided that one protected characteristic is any more 'serious' or 'important' than another; has not created a list of priorities for which equality issue should be addressed first or last.
QED - like it or not, homophobia is as much a criminal offence as racism and had CKR been making racial gestures at the crowd, I can't help thinking more people would be welcoming this conviction. The position is that as a society, we have to catch up and realise that there aren't acceptable homophobic abuses any more than there are acceptable racist abuses.
If you continue to think that homophobic abuse is 'banter', or 'a bit of fun', or 'only aimed at others so why worry about it', then it's your attitude that needs to change first, not the attitude of those that believe that this arrest, charge and conviction were necessary, were the right thing to do, and are a clear indication that such behaviour is unacceptable in any environment, including the 'banter'-laden world of professional football.
Football vs. Homophobia... unless someone was just having a laugh and didn't really mean to offend anyone, eh?
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include sexual orientation. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their sexual orientation.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include gender. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their gender.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include race/ethnicity. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their race/ethnicity.
The Equality Act 2010 has created 'protected characteristics'. These characteristics include religion/belief. It is an offence to discriminate against someone based on their religion/belief.
I could continue and list all of the protected characteristics but what would be the point? The simple truth is that the Equality Act has not created a sliding-scale; has not decided that one protected characteristic is any more 'serious' or 'important' than another; has not created a list of priorities for which equality issue should be addressed first or last.
QED - like it or not, homophobia is as much a criminal offence as racism and had CKR been making racial gestures at the crowd, I can't help thinking more people would be welcoming this conviction. The position is that as a society, we have to catch up and realise that there aren't acceptable homophobic abuses any more than there are acceptable racist abuses.
If you continue to think that homophobic abuse is 'banter', or 'a bit of fun', or 'only aimed at others so why worry about it', then it's your attitude that needs to change first, not the attitude of those that believe that this arrest, charge and conviction were necessary, were the right thing to do, and are a clear indication that such behaviour is unacceptable in any environment, including the 'banter'-laden world of professional football.
Football vs. Homophobia... unless someone was just having a laugh and didn't really mean to offend anyone, eh?