Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Cole Palmer on loan?



Whitechapel

Famous Last Words
Jul 19, 2014
4,391
Not in Whitechapel
I see your point, but I ask you also consider this.

The buy back clause being inserted also makes the initial fee for us cheaper. Using your example fees. £15m may allow us to get Palmer permanently with a buy back clause because we give City that insurance policy.

However, remove the buy back clause we’re probably looking £25m to be ours outright. Now let’s say he doesn’t do well and gets one goal and one assist all season. With the buy back clause we don’t stand to lose much by the time we maybe salvage £5m by selling him.

However the £25m with no buy back clause and a bad season and we’re in trouble.

The way I see it, it’s an insurance policy for both sides, especially with a young, relatively unproven, player.

We could probably get players to sign for less money a week if we inserted buy-out clauses in to our contract.

Entirely kneecapping our position if/when we have to sell to skimp on money now will never seem like a good idea to me, especially with the way transfer fees are going constantly

I think with buy backs, they can be negotiated to be a good deal for the buying club, but there's a huge variation in the T's and C's. If it was, we're buying him for £10m and there's a buy back for £60m, that's probably a good deal.

I'd say most Saints fans would say they are happy they've taken on Livramento despite the reported existence of the buy back clause. It all totally depends on the details of the deal negotiated.

If the buyback was £60m then the only reason City would activate it is because he’s worth £60m or more. It’s still not a good deal for us, imo.
 




Heart and Soul

Active member
Jul 7, 2023
136
We could probably get players to sign for less money a week if we inserted buy-out clauses in to our contract.

Entirely kneecapping our position if/when we have to sell to skimp on money now will never seem like a good idea to me, especially with the way transfer fees are going constantly



If the buyback was £60m then the only reason City would activate it is because he’s worth £60m or more. It’s still not a good deal for us, imo.
If we have a player performing at a level Manchester City think would be good enough for them, I'd take that for a season or two regardless if he would then be sold a bit cheaper than in a world with no buy back-clause.
 


BevBHA

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2017
2,366
We could probably get players to sign for less money a week if we inserted buy-out clauses in to our contract.

Entirely kneecapping our position if/when we have to sell to skimp on money now will never seem like a good idea to me, especially with the way transfer fees are going constantly



If the buyback was £60m then the only reason City would activate it is because he’s worth £60m or more. It’s still not a good deal for us, imo.
I see and appreciate your point fully and where you are coming from. It’s a good debate we will have to agree to disagree, as personally for me if the buy back was 60m and city paid it I’d still be happy with the profit
 












A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,377
Deepest, darkest Sussex
At least it should silence that ridiculous Mitoma stuff
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Not worth a new thread but Trossard scores a deflected equaliser in the 100th minute against City to take it to penalties in the Charity shield.

Looking like an Arsenal win now…and it is
 




The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
10,106
Was never going to happen.
Trossard looking like he could go on to be one of the players of the season after last year and his pre-season.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
55,711
Faversham
Was never going to happen.
Trossard looking like he could go on to be one of the substitutes of the season after last year and his pre-season.
Slight edit....
 






Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,566
Arsenal celebrating fluking the Community Shield as if it was the Champions League. Twats.

It was quite funny, given they're a club with a decent history of winning proper trophies. I couldn't even remember who won the last one, until one of the sports writers said it was Liverpool.

I daresay if we won it (again), we'd celebrate, but that's more relative to our status within the game, isn't it?

I can't work out whether Arsenal are going to be decent or not this season. In some ways, last season felt like a bit of a fluke: a season where several of the clubs who had been contenders, or at least very good, over the previous few years all fluffed it, rather like when Leicester won the league.
 




dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,175
London
Lots of talk of a loan to West Ham now


Bit strange .... But maybe they can guarantee more playing time.

Are we more interested in mcatee?

Reading the article it sounds more like west ham want him but I suspect man city will politely decline ..
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,837
Almería
Bit strange .... But maybe they can guarantee more playing time.

Are we more interested in mcatee?

If we got Kudus, would we still be interested? I wouldn't have thought so.

Also, City want Paqueta so maybe Palmer will be a bargaining chip in that deal.
 






indy3050

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2011
1,389
He’s just scored again! Great header back across the goal. KDB out for months too.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here