seagulls99
Active member
- Feb 10, 2012
- 400
Were you angry at the time or just since he's become the player Gus could never produce?
Why so keen to get a player in who won't play this season?This.
As my signature thread states so would I.Personally I would like us to have always played four genuine attacking players, ie CMS or Hoskins, KLL/noone and Buckley, plus either Dobbie or Orlandi behind the central striker.
So what happens then if CMS smashes another say 10 goals in by January will the club still sell for his asking price or do what other clubs would and say jesus, That's pumped his transfere up a few million or will be the only club that sticks to our pittance of a transfere fee?
Like I said before, I am a fan of CMS but sometimes his shooting and touch are horrific. I appreciate he has been our only outlet for a while and he is having a good season. Ultimately I think we could find a good replacement for less money than CMS cost.Yeah definitely with that price tag comes a level of expectation.
I don't believe Gus did anything to help CMS last year.
He still falling into that 'must cram in more defensive midfielders' trap, even if their not, which is no use to CMS.
But CMS is obviously better as we are getting better.
The fact that for a few more weeks, at least, he's been our only creditable striker for 18 months, speaks volumes.
Like I said before, I am a fan of CMS but sometimes his shooting and touch are horrific. I appreciate he has been our only outlet for a while and he is having a good season. Ultimately I think we could find a good replacement for less money than CMS cost.
Barnes first touch and shooting is dire. He needs to go before CMS.
And that's where we differ.Ultimately I think we could find a good replacement for less money than CMS cost.
But nobody is potentially offering millions for Barnes?
To true. We'd get at most for Barnes is £300,000 max for him. That's why I'm and still trying to get my head around that some posters on here said Barnes is a better player. Truly baffling.
To true. We'd get at most for Barnes is £300,000 max for him. That's why I'm and still trying to get my head around that some posters on here said Barnes is a better player. Truly baffling.
But nobody is potentially offering millions for Barnes?
I think it was plain for everyone to see, just how much we missed Cms, when he was injured for them few games. He is the best striker at the club by a million miles, would be a massive mistake to sell him in January, as whoever may be coming in would need time to adjust to a new team, unless of course the person coming in was a very very high class player. Would be a massive call to sell our top scorer in January, if we are challenging for the play offs...Either very clever or amazingly stupid.
And that's where we differ.
For us to get someone else in, and for him to be productive within 18 months (or else we can kiss goodbye to promotion next season), he would need to be either:-
A world beater, but he won't be for that money.
or
A damn sight better supported.
Which would beg the question why the hell are we still occasionally hanging CMS out to dry with only 2 massive centre half lumps, for company.
How do u arrive at 300k? (and i'm not saying barnes is better..different style for starters)