I'm probably reading this wrong but you are not suggesting that Baldock is prolific are you?
He should have been played up front with Barnes, but we didn't have the right player to fit in on the left, so Barnes was sacrificed to play there.
CMS first season, he scored 11 for us. That's not a bad return for someone who'd never played in the Championship before.
He had lovely hair.
Big difference. Harley cost 250k. Not 3 million. CMS scored over 30 goals before he joined us. He came with a good reputation. Yes he was a failure
He should have been played up front with Barnes, but we didn't have the right player to fit in on the left, so Barnes was sacrificed to play there.
We all witnessed him missing sitters the chances were there he just didn't have the ability and the first touch was shocking at times.No, we failed him. He came to us from Peterborough at a time when they were playing explosive attacking football in a marauding style with a midfield led by Boyd running at teams at pace, CMS fitted into that style perfectly. We then solved a square peg into a round hole by playing a vastly different style and expected him to be as effective - was never going to work for him, or us!
I've never known a player to achieve so little but retain the faith or so many key people.
Also , the reason he was so 'likeable' at Albion (last off the pitch etc) was a ploy to deflect from his pss poor performances.
Oh, and we didn't fail him. He simply lacked the coordination to score goals
Didn't he go on loan to Peterborough from us as well? Surely he'll be non-league before too long. Back at Dagenham?
I've never known a player to achieve so little but retain the faith or so many key people.
Also , the reason he was so 'likeable' at Albion (last off the pitch etc) was a ploy to deflect from his pss poor performances.
Oh, and we didn't fail him. He simply lacked the coordination to score goals