ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
I've done it. It wasn't that bad to fill in and after the season we've just had 10 minutes to provide a survey to the club they've asked me to fill in for them is the least I could do.
Sent to my 5yo son.
Prize is LAST SEASON'S shirt.
Poor/10.
I did it but apart from the spelling mistakes, I love the fact if it ask if adverts are your favourite thing on the big screen. And doesn't offer distance as a reason for not watching the WSL games. Asks a set of questions for the 1901 experience and then exactly the same question for my lounge. Doesn't like choosing zero as the number of games I handed over my ticket to someone else. Doesn't give going on your own to games as an option. And I thought the reason people don't have Amex is fairly well understood - especially as you couldn't use one at the stadium for the first year or so.
Appreciate the summary.
I nearly ploughed in because I like to guess which age child put the survey together whilst doing work experience at the club. Sounds about 12-13 years old this year.
Walked in on a group of nekkid men at Withdean gym changing rooms this morning, just as one was saying to the others '...and then it asked me what kind of member I was' to a great shaking of heads. Was mightily relieved when he went on to mutter something about '1901'. Aha, says I, you'll be talking about the rubbish Albion questionnare then...
Walked in on a group of nekkid men at Withdean gym changing rooms this morning
Haha. What was the problem last year? Couldn't actually enter it, or something IIRC?
Anyway, if they send this survey to an infant, not sure I trust them with the survey data.
I can't remember, but it's a generally a mix of spelling mistakes, poor grammar, questions open to misinterpretation and badly-structured questions including asking mandatory follow-up questions even when the respondent had answered "no" to a previous question.
A lot of time and money can be spent on creating a survey to yield the best results and whilst I'm certainly not advocating that, it would be nice if the club questionnaires looked like someone had taken the effort to have it proof-read and/or sense-checked before pressing the "send" button.
This. It's the kind of bumbling effort we'd expect in the Withdean era. Questionnaire's just not PL Ready. There's no excuse really. Too many suits in lanyards swanning around the Amex just winging it and hoping nobody calls them out.
Given it's on line I fail to see why its not more dynamic thereby depending on your answer the next question either pops up or is binned.
A clear example right at the start of the questionnaire. Question was on whether 1901, ST, etc but then next question was did you have a membership last season. If you have answered ST why is the membership question required.
Also lots of the questions or responses are poorly worded so that it is impossible to provide the answer that is relevant to you, so you are left trying to guess what the club really meant,
The whole thing just smacks of 'I didn't do nothing' - So you did something or do they mean they did nothing but the grammar is poor
Given it's on line I fail to see why its not more dynamic thereby depending on your answer the next question either pops up or is binned.
A clear example right at the start of the questionnaire. Question was on whether 1901, ST, etc but then next question was did you have a membership last season. If you have answered ST why is the membership question required.
Also lots of the questions or responses are poorly worded so that it is impossible to provide the answer that is relevant to you, so you are left trying to guess what the club really meant,
The whole thing just smacks of 'I didn't do nothing' - So you did something or do they mean they did nothing but the grammar is poor
First thing I noticed too.
If they want to incentivise people completing the shirt, just make it a "2018/19 shirt on release, signed by all the players".
Last year's shirt provides little motivation for anyone.