Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Misc] Christians seem to be really good people



Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,214
Goldstone
If he rose from the dead, doesn't that help to back up his claim of being the son of God?

If he had risen from the dead, then yes, I'd believe he was the son of God. He didn't.

It's what scholarship says.

It's what some people have said. Not all of them. And even if they all did (they didn't) it wouldn't be a fact.

Thomas didn't believe it did he? Presumably so scholars agree that Thomas didn't believe it?
 




kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
I will die on my fence!! :lol:
You will if you stay there too long, yes.
I may be persuaded that a yes could be assumed for number 1 with the caveat that I accept that it is likely that a dude named Jesus was around at the time and was preaching about stuff and caused some difficulties for the powers that be.
OK
 


CaptainDaveUK

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2010
1,537
I am agnostic on whether all 12 believe they saw him, maybe a couple did and the rest didn't want to feel left out or have one of the others ruling the roost because they saw him when others did not, peer pressure to say they saw him when they did not.

Assuming, and it is an assumption, that Jesus was walking about a few days after he was crucified for 6 hours, I think the most plausible explanation is that he was taken down from the cross before he was dead and survived the experience. He would not be the only person in history to have survived crucifixion.
Pilate was not keen on executing him according to the Bible, and hoped the flogging would satisfy the blood lust of those that he had offended, perhaps a reason why he permitted his body to be removed after just 6 hours. The other guys up on crosses were still alive at the point Jesus was taken down. and had their legs broken to hasten the process, supposedly, you would need to take some of the weight of your body on your legs to be able to breathe during a crucifixion. Jesus' legs were not broken.

Do you accept that a good number of Elvis fans said they had seen him alive after his death?
The Jewish leaders wanted Jesus dead and to stay dead. They were there at the crucifixion and watched Roman soldiers pierce his side to check he was dead. They were expert executioners and broke the legs of people so they couldn’t push their bodies up the cross to breathe. After they killed Jesus they put him in a tomb, sealed it and the Jewish leaders requested that Roman soldiers were posted to guard the tomb, because they didn’t want the disciples to steal the body and claim Jesus had rose from the dead. They were the only ones that would have anything to gain by faking his resurrection, so it seems unbelievable that all but one of the disciples (John) died a martyrs death for something that they knew was a lie, unless of course they were completely convinced it was true.
 


kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
The Jewish leaders wanted Jesus dead and to stay dead. They were there at the crucifixion and watch Roman soldiers pierce his side to check he was dead. They were expert executioners and broke the legs of people so they couldn’t push their bodies up the cross to breathe. After they killed Jesus they put him in a tomb, sealed it and the Jewish leaders requested that Roman soldiers were posted to guard the tomb, because they didn’t want the disciples to steal the body and claim Jesus had rose from the dead. They were the only ones that would have anything to gain by faking his resurrection, so it seems unbelievable that all but one of the disciples (John) died a martyrs death for something that they knew was a lie, unless of course they were completely convinced it was true.
I broadly agree with what you say here. Regarding the disciples dying as martyrs, I don't know for sure about all of them, but I'm pretty sure Peter and Andrew did. Paul, although not one of the original twelve, was probably martyred in Rome. Thomas is said to have been killed in the south of India (Christianity has been there for well over a thousand years, said to have been brought there by him in the first century). And of course there were many others, too, such as Polycarp, who was a close friend of the apostle John, who were killed for their insistence that Jesus had risen from the dead. Like you say, these people obviously took their claims seriously if they were prepared to die for them. A clear case of putting your money where your mouth is.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
If he had risen from the dead, then yes, I'd believe he was the son of God. He didn't.



It's what some people have said. Not all of them. And even if they all did (they didn't) it wouldn't be a fact.

Thomas didn't believe it did he? Presumably so scholars agree that Thomas didn't believe it?
The Question is: Did Thomas go to heaven?
 






kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
The Question is: Did Thomas go to heaven?
He was a follower of Jesus. Although initially doubtful when first told about it, he subsequently believed in the resurrection.
 


kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
No.

But then the other disciples didn't either
If I did what you've just done you would complain that I was saying something that I had no proof for.
Edit: you can't just say "NO" You can say, in your opinion no, because you think the disciples must have been having a group hallucination, or something like that.
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
I have another question too : What was Jesus crucified for? Are their records of this from the time?
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
If I did what you've just done you would complain that I was saying something that I had no proof for.
I think he was making a bit of a joke.
 


Blues Guitarist

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2020
597
St Johann in Tirol
Here's a table showing my understanding of where we stand:

_________________ 1_______________2____________ 3____________4
Kuzushi__________Yes____________Yes___________Yes___________Yes
Bald Seagull_______Yes____________Yes___________Yes___________?
Bart Ehrman______ Yes____________Yes___________Yes___________No
Blues guitarist_____ Yes____________Yes___________Yes__________ No
Triggaar__________Yes____________Yes____________?____________No
Bad fish__________Yes*_____________?_____________?____________No
Guinness Boy_____?_______________?_____________?_____________?








*I may be persuaded that a yes could be assumed for number 1 with the caveat that I accept that it is likely that a dude named Jesus was around at the time and was preaching about stuff and caused some difficulties for the powers that be.
Stop telling me what I think and pretending that I support your beliefs. You don’t know what I think, and your yes/no poll is an insult to people who do serious historical research.

To clarify, god doesn’t exist and Jesus wasn’t god.
 




Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
5,722
Darlington
A few more than two and I'm in around the edges, I'll admit.

I guess this feels like the Brexit thread to me. Two binary positions from which most people won't shift. It's interesting for a while but it soon repeats the same themes and the point of "winning" is to convert a very small number of undecideds.
I'm on the verge of running down to my local Methodist church and signing on.
I'm just waiting to hear about what tax benefits I can expect.
 


kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
I have another question too : What was Jesus crucified for? Are their records of this from the time?

The charge was blasphemy, when he told the high priest that he would see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven.
Jesus had been responding to the various charges with silence, but then the high priest commanded him to answer, so he had no choice but to speak:


Matthew 26

62 Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, ‘Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?’ 63 But Jesus remained silent.

The high priest said to him, ‘I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God.’

64 ‘You have said so,’ Jesus replied. ‘But I say to all of you: from now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.’[e]

65 Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, ‘He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. 66 What do you think?’

‘He is worthy of death,’ they answered.


67 Then they spat in his face and struck him with their fists. Others slapped him 68 and said, ‘Prophesy to us, Messiah. Who hit you?’











Mark 14

Then the high priest stood up before them and asked Jesus, ‘Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?’ 61 But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer.

Again the high priest asked him, ‘Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?’

62 ‘I am,’ said Jesus. ‘And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.’

63 The high priest tore his clothes. ‘Why do we need any more witnesses?’ he asked. 64 ‘You have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?’


They all condemned him as worthy of death. 65 Then some began to spit at him; they blindfolded him, struck him with their fists, and said, ‘Prophesy!’ And the guards took him and beat him.


Luke 22
66 At daybreak the council of the elders of the people, both the chief priests and the teachers of the law, met together, and Jesus was led before them. 67 ‘If you are the Messiah,’ they said, ‘tell us.’

Jesus answered, ‘If I tell you, you will not believe me, 68 and if I asked you, you would not answer. 69 But from now on, the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the mighty God.’

70 They all asked, ‘Are you then the Son of God?’

He replied, ‘You say that I am.’

71 Then they said, ‘Why do we need any more testimony? We have heard it from his own lips.’
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
The charge was blasphemy, when he told the high priest that he would see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven.
Jesus had been responding to the various charges with silence, but then the high priest commanded him to answer, so he had no choice but to speak:


Matthew 26

62 Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, ‘Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?’ 63 But Jesus remained silent.

The high priest said to him, ‘I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God.’

64 ‘You have said so,’ Jesus replied. ‘But I say to all of you: from now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.’[e]

65 Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, ‘He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. 66 What do you think?’

‘He is worthy of death,’ they answered.


67 Then they spat in his face and struck him with their fists. Others slapped him 68 and said, ‘Prophesy to us, Messiah. Who hit you?’











Mark 14

Then the high priest stood up before them and asked Jesus, ‘Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?’ 61 But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer.

Again the high priest asked him, ‘Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?’

62 ‘I am,’ said Jesus. ‘And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.’

63 The high priest tore his clothes. ‘Why do we need any more witnesses?’ he asked. 64 ‘You have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?’


They all condemned him as worthy of death. 65 Then some began to spit at him; they blindfolded him, struck him with their fists, and said, ‘Prophesy!’ And the guards took him and beat him.
Can you have another go remembering that I don't count the bible as a decent source of information?
 




Blues Guitarist

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2020
597
St Johann in Tirol
If I did what you've just done you would complain that I was saying something that I had no proof for.
Edit: you can't just say "NO" You can say, in your opinion no, because you think the disciples must have been having a group hallucination, or something like that.
If you had read the bible you would know that no one has gone to heaven. The dead are all rotting in their graves - until Jesus returns, which he hasn’t done. So what Triggaaar said is 100% correct, and your response is dumb.
 


kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
Can you have another go remembering that I don't count the bible as a decent source of information?
I'm posting them so that you can see the relevant passages easily. That's where the charge of blasphemy is. The bit he says about the Son of Man coming in the clouds is a reference to Daniel chapter 7, which is why what he said was considered blasphemy. Outside of the Bible there might be references to the charges in the Jewish Talmud, but I'm not sure. I'd have to look into that.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
I'm posting them so that you can see the relevant passages easily. That's where the charge of blasphemy is. The bit he says about the Son of Man coming in the clouds is a reference to Daniel chapter 7, which is why what he said was considered blasphemy. Outside of the Bible there might be references to the charges in the Jewish Talmud, but I'm not sure. I'd have to look into that.
So outside of the bible we don't really have any evidence?
 


kuzushi

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2015
710
If you had read the bible you would know that no one has gone to heaven. The dead are all rotting in their graves - until Jesus returns, which he hasn’t done. So what Triggaaar said is 100% correct,
Well, we're discussing the resurrection specifically here, not eschatology or anything else. I didn't say anyone was or wasn't currently in heaven, I just said that Triggaaar had asserted as absolute fact something that he doesn't know. The bit where you say "So what Triggaar said is 100% correct" sounds like you are agreeing with him based on scripture, which is ironic.

and your response is dumb.
Resorting to abuse. Have you noticed that I don't do that?
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,214
Goldstone
If I did what you've just done you would complain that I was saying something that I had no proof for.

Yes I know, I'm just copying your style. Although there is a ton of proof that things in the bible are not true. Including proof that the shroud is fake.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
If you had read the bible you would know that no one has gone to heaven. The dead are all rotting in their graves - until Jesus returns, which he hasn’t done. So what Triggaaar said is 100% correct, and your response is dumb.
Does the bible sat that souls are only going to heaven once Jesus returns? I didn't know that, that's interesting.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here