LamieRobertson
Not awoke
3 weeks tomorrow....
*cough*goalkeeper*cough*
It was very close to done when we heard about Grabban, I don't know what happened with Baldock (apart from the fact we didn't sign him).We heard about trying to sign Baldock and Grabban.
No, we had CMS, Ulloa and Hoskins (and Fenelon was ours then too). Only one of those was playing, which meant we needed someone in on loan, but given we had CMS and Ulloa contracted for the next season, and Grabban was to be a permanent deal, we were obviously prepared to have 3 permanent good strikers. It's obvious that we'll be trying to get another striker, there is no way we're not.When we tried to sign Grabban we had 1 striker, the club was aware Barnes was leaving. We now have 2, 3 if we're including Fenelon.
When we tried to sign Grabban we had 1 striker, the club was aware Barnes was leaving. We now have 2, 3 if we're including Fenelon. I don't think it's a dead cert that we will be after another striker, but I'll say it again, I hope we do.
No, we had CMS, Ulloa and Hoskins (and Fenelon was ours then too). Only one of those was playing, which meant we needed someone in on loan, but given we had CMS and Ulloa contracted for the next season, and Grabban was to be a permanent deal, we were obviously prepared to have 3 permanent good strikers. It's obvious that we'll be trying to get another striker, there is no way we're not.
As I've already said, they were just out for a few more months, so a loan would have been the way to cover for them. We went for a permanent signing on top of what we had.But we knew niether Hoskins or CMS were going to be available
I didn't even mention Barnes.and Barnes was on the way out
No they weren't. Last season we had Ulloa, CMS, Barnes and Hoskins on permanent deals. And when one was going (Barnes) we tried to get another permanent striker. They all took up wages, which meant we were limited in what we could get on loan.so yes the club were happy to exist on very limited striking resources, less than we have now.
We heard about trying to sign Baldock and Grabban.
When we tried to sign Grabban we had 1 striker, the club was aware Barnes was leaving. We now have 2, 3 if we're including Fenelon. I don't think it's a dead cert that we will be after another striker, but I'll say it again, I hope we do.
As I've already said, they were just out for a few more months, so a loan would have been the way to cover for them. We went for a permanent signing on top of what we had.
I didn't even mention Barnes.
No they weren't. Last season we had Ulloa, CMS, Barnes and Hoskins on permanent deals. And when one was going (Barnes) we tried to get another permanent striker. They all took up wages, which meant we were limited in what we could get on loan.
There's nothing to suggest we'd stick with just CMS, O'Grady and Fenelon, particularly given the money we've received from Ulloa, and the low wages Fenelon will be on.
TB has maintained will spend what we can within the FFP limits, and Sami has joined us because of our ambition to move forward. It really is foolish to to think we're not trying to get another striker (loan or permanent).
That's rich:OK Trig, you keep going round in circles ignoring what I'm saying
we had CMS, Ulloa and Hoskins (and Fenelon was ours then too). Only one of those was playing, which meant we needed someone in on loan
But we knew niether Hoskins or CMS were going to be available
We heard about trying to sign Baldock and Grabban.
When we tried to sign Grabban we had 1 striker, the club was aware Barnes was leaving. We now have 2, 3 if we're including Fenelon. I don't think it's a dead cert that we will be after another striker, but I'll say it again, I hope we do.
That's rich:
You're saying it's not a dead cert that we'll be after another striker, I'm saying it is.
As I've already said, they were just out for a few more months, so a loan would have been the way to cover for them. We went for a permanent signing on top of what we had.
I didn't even mention Barnes.
No they weren't. Last season we had Ulloa, CMS, Barnes and Hoskins on permanent deals. And when one was going (Barnes) we tried to get another permanent striker. They all took up wages, which meant we were limited in what we could get on loan.
There's nothing to suggest we'd stick with just CMS, O'Grady and Fenelon, particularly given the money we've received from Ulloa, and the low wages Fenelon will be on.
TB has maintained will spend what we can within the FFP limits, and Sami has joined us because of our ambition to move forward. It really is foolish to to think we're not trying to get another striker (loan or permanent).
We heard about trying to sign Baldock and Grabban.
When we tried to sign Grabban we had 1 striker, the club was aware Barnes was leaving. We now have 2, 3 if we're including Fenelon. I don't think it's a dead cert that we will be after another striker, but I'll say it again, I hope we do.
We'll said.
I don't think it's a dead cert that we will be after another striker, but I'll say it again, I hope we do.
"This is an area we want to strengthen and Chris is a good start. He is a strong, physical presence and gives us something different to the other strikers we already have here at the club.
"You need that option in the squad of a forward with power and strength, and Chris can give us that - as well as scoring goals. We still want some extra attacking additions, and in other areas of the team, but I'm pleased we have another one of our targets."
Doesn't he have a brother called Toxteth....!?
I don't get it
It's a young ones reference.
The young ones?
Happy with this signing, class at holding up the ball.
It's a young ones reference.