Prolific? No. Was Ulloa? No.
Well his ratio was 1 in 2 which is prolific
I think it just felt like it, because with Buckley, Crofts, CMS etc injured, we weren't scoring enough goals, and Ulloa often struggled without support. And when Ulloa was looking good he then broke his foot, and that took a bit of time to get over. But he's an excellent striker IMO, and the only saving grace is that we seem to have got a fair price for him.but he missed a lot of games didn't he? Maybe it just feels like it. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather he stayed, but it's not the end of the world
Let's hope the club are successful finding a replacement.