- Aug 7, 2003
- 8,073
I’ve never had a second club, but now CH is in charge of Forest, I hope they do well and will be watching their results.
I’ve never had a second club, but now CH is in charge of Forest, I hope they do well and will be watching their results.
No.
Leeds are bigger. Three league titles in three different decades. Forest barely won a thing until Clough turned up and have never come close to winning anything since.
Jose Mourinho said it all. "I walked all the way [around the city] and when I saw the stadium I thought: 'Are you kidding me - this club won the European Cup? Twice?'
"It was a nice stadium and a nice city, but it was a small place. It was the size of the stadium that really took me aback.
"A small stadium, a small crowd - I looked around and tried to take it in."
No.
Leeds are bigger. Three league titles in three different decades. Forest barely won a thing until Clough turned up and have never come close to winning anything since.
Jose Mourinho said it all. "I walked all the way [around the city] and when I saw the stadium I thought: 'Are you kidding me - this club won the European Cup? Twice?'
"It was a nice stadium and a nice city, but it was a small place. It was the size of the stadium that really took me aback.
"A small stadium, a small crowd - I looked around and tried to take it in."
It won't be my second club, but I will be looking out for their results, in the same way that I look out for the results of clubs that have taken one of our youngsters on loan, and hoping they do well.
Forest are, I think, the only club that have won the European Cup more times than they won their league (that's the European CUP - 'Champions' League doesn't count).But they did didn't they
And you can never take that away
Silver fox youngsters
Only 5 English clubs have ever won the European Cup, Forest back to back, and for me that usurps any argument about their overall history,, but I totally agree that it’s obviously dependent on the individual’s subjective criteria.
Number 1) honestly no idea.
Huh?
Dunno about that. Maybe in England, but if you are below 50 and living elsewhere in the world... not sure a lot would have them on their list. It all depends on the criterias though. Are they a top 10 club counted in nice trophys etc? Most likely. Top 10 in being "well-known" etc? More questionable.
Probably varies from country to country but in Sweden (and possibly Scandinavia) I would say these are the teams with most supporters:
1. Liverpool
2. Manchester United
3. Arsenal
4. Chelsea
5. Manchester City
6. Aston Villa
7. Tottenham
8. Everton
9. Leeds
10. Wolverhampton
But then again.. "global support" is just one of many criterias you could use to decide the biggest clubs.
Oh ...........Chris being a silver fox Youngster
For you to follow the fortunes of
And turned us down for Oxford if I remember rightly.
Oh ...........
OK then.
Villa are not bigger than Spurs... Spurs have underachieved ......though.
Definitely underachieved. But as the biggest club in our second city there is not much to choose between them.
... they may not as big as United or City or Liverpool; very few are - but still they're a pretty decent sized club.
I would say they're bigger than City. City didn't have a great record until they started buying success. Forest won big trophies playing on a level playing field.
Probably right. Why tho DKM are Birmingham just so Shiite ?
I know it’s a scummy area but where villa play is crap as well.
I think that could be a giant club