Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Chris Houghton still unemployed
- Thread starter Charlies Shinpad
- Start date
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ
Hove / Παρος
Absolutely, he agreed a deal until 2021 and as it wasn't a mutual parting, we'll have either paid his contract up in full, or be doing a Chelsea and have him on gardening leave until his next job. I'd hardly be in a rush to start a new job if I'd just been paid 2 years Premier League wages in advance and didn't have to do any work for it.
StonehamPark
#Brighton-Nil
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;8958137 said:But ZERO shots on target also
True. Although carrying on with this current form will see us qualifying for the Champions League.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
...well that was the desire of one Derby fan who rang in to Talkshite this evening
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,339
I could have managed that on the fixtures he has had...….
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
The trend for owners seems to be with the younger manager could be a while before we see Chris back on touch line.
Are you sure? I suspect that, having been sacked, his contract was either paid up, a financial agreement reached or the club just stopped paying and it's up to him to take them to court. If you're sacked, you stop getting a salary.
de la zouch
Well-known member
- Jul 12, 2007
- 572
It doesn't work quite like that for most managers, 90% of managers have a contract with a termination clause which generally equals 1 years salary. Chelski were a naive exception to this rule along with a few others. Chris won't be at the begging bowl but neither will he be sat on a two year payout.
warmleyseagull
Well-known member
Europa League if Bolton had got promoted instead of Norwich or SU.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
In football, when you're sacked the contract is paid in full. He probably got a lump sum rather than a monthly salary.
Mutual agreement means all ties are severed.
Gus had a large 2 million agreement on his contract, which was why he wasn't sacked, but the club dismissed him for disciplinary matters rather than sacking him.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Chris Hughton applied for the Brighton job when Hyypia was given the post. He was still available six months later, when Sami resigned. I doubt he was on the breadline for that six months.
Really interesting. The point still stands however; no need for him to rush back in. We have paid him some kind of compensation (which he deserves for committing to our long term future) and he can return to a job that he sees as a good opportunity, rather than having to grasp at anything that comes up.
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
His stock is very high, he'll be waiting for the right job with the right backing. Not sure WBA or Boro (or Derby) fit the bill. My money is still on Leeds
I think you have that the wrong way round. When we sacked GP we didn't pay his contract because if was for gross misconduct. He took us to court but withdrew when he got the Sunderland job. What manager is going to agree to leave on 'mutual agreement' if it doesn't come with a pay off?
I suspect the club did make a payment to Hughton as it was different circumstances to GP but who really knows? However, I assume that it was described as a sacking as Hughton didn't want to go.
Official Old Man
Uckfield Seagull
Did you know?
Alphabetically, the worst BHA could be at the start of a season is 15th*, with Burton and Bury being relegated.
*based on the current 92 FL clubs.
Charlies Shinpad
New member
- Thread starter
- #39
I was on about Swansea as I forgot about Boro as well
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
schmunk
Why oh why oh why?
By that measure, Derby really do need to get rid of Lamps...