I can't belive this took so long to appear, thought it'd be nice and frothy mouthed for a few hours already.
I don't think a fine was particularly necessary, and it's hardly offensive, but if it made the presenter uncomfortable then regardless of whether he thought it was harmless fun or not, it wasn't.
That's to be expected, she's a Palace slag.
How can you ensure that you do not cause discomfort when trying trying to get a date with someone?
Ever seen Alan Carr or Graham Norton's chat shows?
Also did Reid get fined 5k? I've not seen the interview (just read the article) FWIW but if he made her feel uncomfortable just an apology would have done...
i thought this was about the infamous one from lewes years agothe world has gone f***ing mad , fined for a bit of harmless flirting
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-35229309
i thought this was about the infamous one from lewes years ago
regards
DR
The girl's employer has to take some responsibility here; if he's a known philanderer then they should have had a bloke interview him or not interviewed him at all. When I worked outside mending phones, there were a few places that had notes on such as "Two man job" or "no women to attend alone".
Why should any 'known philanderer' dictate who does or doesn't interview him? The onus is on him to behave himself professionally, especially somewhere which is considered both his and her workplace.
Doing almost everything opposite to Gayle would be a good start.How can you ensure that you do not cause discomfort when trying trying to get a date with someone?
I think it is more a case of knowingly putting someone in that situation when a bit of common sense would have shielded her from any harassment. Not to say that he should be allowed to act like that, but that there needs to be some form of protection for staff from their employers
The girl's employer has to take some responsibility here; if he's a known philanderer then they should have had a bloke interview him or not interviewed him at all. When I worked outside mending phones, there were a few places that had notes on such as "Two man job" or "no women to attend alone".
But that would legitimise his behaviour.
"Don't let a woman interview her - he'll only harrass her..."
How about the more reasonable and professional "Chris - don't harrass her...?"
However, if there is a risk he will then what is the point of putting someone in that position?