Jolly Red Giant
Well-known member
- Jul 11, 2015
- 2,615
Souness has always been an obnoxious little Tory toad.
Best just cancel him anyway tho eh
With all the stuff going on in the world with energy prices, war etc, I find it hard to get worried about this. I guess I am in the minority.
man marking = disgraceful and unacceptable in the modern world.
linesman = as above
Manager = just change it to Personager!
Fan = rhymes with Man, must get rid also
No more Balls in Football = connotations to male genitalia is unfair
Ball Boy = Youngsters should know better too
Okay, let's just be sensible and rational about it.
Firstly, an unwise choice of words- especially given the summer we've had. It's a stock phrase that has been imputed in many old school folk. I guess I'm old school, but it's alien to me. It's a game for everyone. But I'm not going to get angry over a slip of words from someone so conditioned.
So all that's needed is a quiet word and, more importantly, folk to try and understand what he really meant. Souness making a foo-pah is not going to set the women's game back. The only grunts of approval will come from those who always grunt their approval- like a few on here who might rise from the Bear-Pit.
His actual point was that football has become too sanitised in its physical passion. That the slightest of contact is deemed a transgression. I agree with him (although I wouldn't want to see a return to the extremes of the 70s and 80s when the physicality was quite shocking and it wasn't a beautiful game).
So the moral of the story is that Souness needs to choose his words more carefully less they be miss-interpreted, or deliberately miss-interpreted. And generally, he could do with getting with the times.
If you look up Dinosaur in the dictionary there is just a picture of Graeme Souness in there.
Okay, let's just be sensible and rational about it.
Okay, let's just be sensible and rational about it.
Firstly, an unwise choice of words- especially given the summer we've had. It's a stock phrase that has been imputed in many old school folk. I guess I'm old school, but it's alien to me. It's a game for everyone. But I'm not going to get angry over a slip of words from someone so conditioned.
So all that's needed is a quiet word and, more importantly, folk to try and understand what he really meant. Souness making a foo-pah is not going to set the women's game back. The only grunts of approval will come from those who always grunt their approval- like a few on here who might rise from the Bear-Pit.
His actual point was that football has become too sanitised in its physical passion. That the slightest of contact is deemed a transgression. I agree with him (although I wouldn't want to see a return to the extremes of the 70s and 80s when the physicality was quite shocking and it wasn't a beautiful game).
So the moral of the story is that Souness needs to choose his words more carefully less they be miss-interpreted, or deliberately miss-interpreted. And generally, he could do with getting with the times.
I commented on this on the Premier league games thread at the time. Bearing in mind he said it three times I think he did pick his words carefully. Absolutely no need to get his point across in that way, particularly because of the negative sentiment implied about women footballers. It came across as quite bullying to the female player and I felt he should be embarrassed to behave in that way. Turns out he wasn’t. I’m not at all interested in women's football but that isn’t really the point.
2 Games on a Sunday afternoon he watched,
Equals 44+ men playing football
Equals Man's Game.
Getting really fed up with the increase in people finding any excuse to play the sexist/ racist card these days.
Sent from my CPH2195 using Tapatalk