The Spanish
Well-known member
I just think the model is snidey. I don't disagree with the premise that they need to make their money, but there is something unreasonable about the obsene surcharge for taking what most would consider to be a very ordinary amount of luggage. I'd have less of an issue with this if they provided lockers for people to store stuff they didn't want to take, but really once you are at the airport you are at their mercy. Equally, I don't mind the charges for different payment methods, food, choice of seat or whatever - it's not as if they are hidden charges and there are always alternatives. But luggage I take issue with, and it has created the problem being discussed on this thread.
Agreed on all counts.
most 'full service' carriers charge 1% of full published fare per kilo over. thats eye watering. but they arent charities either. i see what you mean about snidey yes its a broken up package that previously people didnt see, but in all honesty theres an argument that it is less snidey and more transparent.
it takes some getting used to paying overweight surcharges on what you consider previously a reasonable amount of luggage, until you consider what you WERE paying for it before the package was broken up, or the fares you can now access because of it.
people walk into an airport and suddenly become lord god almighty, its mental you dont see people ranting at the supermarket that you have to put a quid in a trolley.
Last edited: