- Thread starter
- #21
A longtime acquaintance of mine, now in his early 60s was part of the 'group' that met in a pub beforehand, then went to the Chelsea game ONLY if there were no black players in the team, and at the game stood with back to the pitch mouthing at people and looking for people to fight after the game. I have spent a long hour discussing this with him. The football and the racism were irrelevant - it was all about the risk, danger and general buzz. He had mental health issues (depression, especially seasonal, and attention-defecit being part of it).
You will never eradicate racism and homophobia. I don't care. As long as it remains illegal, and people get arrested, banned for football, banged up or sent on graffiti removal manouvres, all nicely reported in the media, generally shamed, possibly sacked from their job, driven into an increasingly small and militant and self destructive band of cockwombles - or take a ****ing good look at themselves and change, then I'm happy.
Still, I would absolutely laugh my bollocks off if Abramovic says '**** you, I'm off'. As we saw under his predecessor, Chelsea do not have the fan base, cachet or earning potential to do anything other than implode and slip down the leagues like a West London version of the Mackems as they attempt to unload players and deal with a cash flow problem that would make the Haitian encomy looke like a damned good investment opportunity..
Outstanding post [emoji122][emoji122][emoji122][emoji122][emoji122][emoji122]