It is where it’s atNew one for Potter tonight
“It is where it’s at”
It is where it’s at
You stupid bastard
It is where it’s at
It is where it’s atNew one for Potter tonight
“It is where it’s at”
Actually we were doing alright, very well in fact, and were perfectly happy. Do you get some sort of virtue points for pretending that we weren't - and do they make you feel better?Perhaps Potter did us all a favour by seizing his chance with Chelsea.
We could have suffered his football for years, and with inertia, never have known about RDZ and how profoundly different possession football could be from Potterball.
Actually, we were doing all right, but we're doing better now! In case you hadn't spotted it, RDZ is an upgrade on Potter, using the same set of players.Actually we were doing alright, very well in fact, and were perfectly happy. Do you get some sort of virtue points for pretending that we weren't - and do they make you feel better?
I'm very happy with where we are now, but I don't feel some sort of neediness to rewrite history.
One for the futureIt is where it’s at
It is where it’s at
You stupid bastard
It is where it’s at
Actually, we were doing all right, but we're doing better now! In case you hadn't spotted it, RDZ is an os still our manager, and we were still in the top ten, would you have been grizzling, 'ooh, we need Roberto De Zerbi' - who I suspect, like me, you wuld never have heard of
Yes, we're doing great. But we were also doing great after the Leicester match. If all that bollocks of Potter leaving for Chelsea hadn't happened, and Potter was still our manager and we were still in the top ten, would you have been grizzling we need a change of manager? Of coursr you wouldn't, unless yoi're a bigger prat rhan 99% of posters on NSC.Actually, we were doing all right, but we're doing better now! In case you hadn't spotted it, RDZ is an upgrade on Potter, using the same set of players.
Far from rewriting history, I'm looking forward to the future we now have with RDZ.
We’d had a 10 or so good game run that happened to coincide with the introduction of Moises who Potter had decided to ignore for three months until that point. Before that we were utter boring toss for 10 or so games and never scored at home. Rinse and repeat the two previous years. I think what we are seeing is our squad was way better than what Potter was getting from it.Actually we were doing alright, very well in fact, and were perfectly happy. Do you get some sort of virtue points for pretending that we weren't - and do they make you feel better?
I'm very happy with where we are now, but I don't feel some sort of neediness to rewrite history.
Do you know what …. I think you’re right.Actually, we were doing all right, but we're doing better now! In case you hadn't spotted it, RDZ is an upgrade on Potter, using the same set of players.
Far from rewriting history, I'm looking forward to the future we now have with RDZ.
Grizzling? Prat? Are you always this aggressive?Yes, we're doing great. But we were also doing great after the Leicester match. If all that bollocks of Potter leaving for Chelsea hadn't happened, and Potter was still our manager and we were still in the top ten, would you have been grizzling we need a change of manager? Of coursr you wouldn't, unless yoi're a bigger prat rhan 99% of posters on NSC.
We are where we are -and it's good. No need to be a prat and re-write what could have been history. Regardless of how De Zerbi does, and where he takes us, Potter's Brighton was heading upwards too. Stupid to think otherwise.
Put it this way. Stoney silence on the park n ride buses going home during 3 seasons of rarely winning at home. Sometimes analysis with fellow supporters on where it’s going wrong, TB often blamed for not buying strikers.Grizzling? Prat? Are you always this aggressive?
For the record, I was never a 'Potter out' person. I thought Potter was the business, even though I wanted to see more, well, goals.
Now we've got RDZ, the goals are flowing, and with the benefit of hindsight, together with five months to compare them, I have come to realise that Potter actually wasn't the height of football management. Perhaps RDZ isn't either. But he's better. The football is intelligent, exciting and produces results.
You need to move on. We are improving. We have a new manager and the Potter era is over.
By the way, if I want to write about Potter, I will do so.
We never really played badly. We competed against most teams. I was never one calling for a new striker, because I could see we were creating chances. It was just the final ball, final product missing. Towards the end, Potter did seem to fix this.Put it this way. Stoney silence on the park n ride buses going home during 3 seasons of rarely winning at home. Sometimes analysis with fellow supporters on where it’s going wrong, TB often blamed for not buying strikers.
These days everyone’s buzzing.
To be fair it's a fair point.Chelsea boss Graham Potter to BBC Sport: "There was a lot of excitement and positivity from the start, a good atmosphere. The spirit of the players was really good. They worked hard for each other against an organised team.
"They've been together a while. We’re a different stage of that – players coming back from injury and new players. We needed time to settle everything down. We were missing the connection, fluidity and confidence that comes from knowing each other.
"The decision we took in the window you can see the profile in terms of age. We feel we have a very strong group of players. We have to gel and become a really good team. That’s where the work is.
"It’s working together. When players have been injured they have not been on the training pitch. We have new players with us. It's about getting ideas across and woring with the group.
"Sometimes you have to look at the whole package. Young players, nice mix of them both. For us it’s about improving and
"New players are adapting to a new country and a new league. It’s not straightforward. When the price tag is what it is questions will be asked, it's the nature of the business."
The argument you are having (unnecessarily aggressively, of course) is nothing to do with rewriting history. The crux of it is that some posters are convinced that what happened at the end of last season and beginning of this represented Potter solving our goal scoring problems, others see it as an anomaly in the pattern of lacking goals. Most sit somewhere in-between.Yes, we're doing great. But we were also doing great after the Leicester match. If all that bollocks of Potter leaving for Chelsea hadn't happened, and Potter was still our manager and we were still in the top ten, would you have been grizzling we need a change of manager? Of coursr you wouldn't, unless yoi're a bigger prat rhan 99% of posters on NSC.
We are where we are -and it's good. No need to be a prat and re-write what could have been history. Regardless of how De Zerbi does, and where he takes us, Potter's Brighton was heading upwards too. Stupid to think otherwise.
No respect for the man that gave him a chance in the PL.Yeah same line..when asked about having too many players..Not us directly but he said if he wanted an easy life he'd have stayed at previous clubs.
Well he could, if he studied De Zerbi's methods and accepted that his style is inferior.I mean, I voted Fulham but that’s the next best thing, surely?
Potter still can’t break down organised teams and never will be able to.