The guy has personally admitted, in court, to absolutely abhorrent behaviour. Whilst he doesn't have a record his name is nowhere near "clear."
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Ched Evans conduct
- Thread starter AWAYDAY
- Start date
The guy has personally admitted, in court, to absolutely abhorrent behaviour. Whilst he doesn't have a record his name is nowhere near "clear."
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Whatever red top hack who wrote that doesn't know his legal precedents
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....n-lose-high-court-actions-battle-compensation
BensGrandad
New member
Of criminal convictions it is
If it's an opinion, why claim that it's 'The Truth'?
As for the subject matter, why don't you come out from behind your keyboard, identify yourself rather than hiding behind a user name, indemnify NSC in respect of any of your provocative and potentially libellous comments (with proof of such indemnity) and I'm sure you will get on fine.
Until then you're on our 'watched' list, the NSC equivalent of wearing an ankle tag.
Wasn't 'No one is innocent' the 'B' side of 'My Way' by Sid Vicious back in the day?
I think it's the other way around.
AWAYDAY
Active member
- Jul 21, 2009
- 237
- Thread starter
- #47
I'm bricking it about this 'watched list' and I'm
not sure how you 'identify yourself' on a forum?!?
Anyways it's pretty clear what my view is of Ched and what others view is of that kind of behaviour is guilty or not in a court of law.
It's been a great day NSC regulars. I'll probably fade back into my boring real life again and leave you lot to it.
All the best...
����
They had two options - and only two options. Guilty or NOT GUILTY. They didn't go for guilty.
Make of that what you will, and then get on with it.
And the Guildford four and Birmingham six.
And that conviction was wrong.
So what do you think 'falsely imprisoned' means?
BensGrandad
New member
Having a pub in Guildford I knew a Police Sergeant who to his dying day maintained they had the right people for the Guildford bombing but a senior officer f...d up the evidence which enabled them to get found not guilty.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Good old tax payer will have to foot that expense then
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,587
It is a specific criminal offence related to kidnapping - being put in prison after being found guilty by a jury is not false imprisonment
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Being put in prison on false evidence.
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,587
No, that's not false imprisonment...and it also not what happened in this case. The jury decided, on the evidence presented to them, that Ched Evans was guilty and then when further evidence was brought forward, a jury decided that he was not guilty. There has been no credible suggestion that anyone lied on either side or that the judges made any mistakes.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
I didn't say it related to this case.
Miscarriages of justice have happened in other cases. The evidence has been falsified to get convictions.
Being held by the police unlawfully is false imprisonment, but that's not kidnapping. But I'm sure you know what BG meant.
I think there has - the complainant denied that she'd use the language that one of the defendants said she used. It looks to me like one of them was lying.