- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,141
It would be absolutely mind blowing if making changes in a multiple of three actually had a demonstrably favourable outcome.Numerology is, though, a tremendously useful input.
Across a much larger sample size obviously.
It would be absolutely mind blowing if making changes in a multiple of three actually had a demonstrably favourable outcome.Numerology is, though, a tremendously useful input.
He has a point though, we haven't been dreadful at all. We've been below our immensely high standards at times, sure, but there is a hell of a long way from there to 'dreadful'Yeah I started supporting Brighton this season. My bad.
Actually I heard when RDZ was 8 ItaliaSport was showing our home game against Blackpool and he watched it through someone's window. He reminds the players that after watching that 3-1 defeat all our performances are great.
And we certainly know what ‘dreadful’ is.He has a point though, we haven't been dreadful at all. We've been below our immensely high standards at times, sure, but there is a hell of a long way from there to 'dreadful'
Lets test it from here in out. So far there is just a correlation from which we make a hypothesis, if it continues we may be able to prove causation. Which would indeed be cool.It would be absolutely mind blowing if making changes in a multiple of three actually had a demonstrably favourable outcome.
Across a much larger sample size obviously.
Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, no?It should be ch-ch-ch-changes.
I think the alternative is not making so many changes.6 changes for United
7 for AEK
9 for Bournemouth
7 for Chelsea
Last season, a clear strength was the partnerships we had. Mac and Caicedo and Estupinan and Mitoma were notable examples and the latter were reunited to devastating affect at half time on Sunday.
This season we have goalkeepers in rotation and the longest run of games any centre back pairing has had is two.
Is it affecting our performances and if so, what’s the alternative?
Some of our fans now expect us to play like Man City in every game. The sense of entitlement from some of our supporter base is absolutely astonishing given where we have come from. They don't know the meaning of the word 'dreadful'.He has a point though, we haven't been dreadful at all. We've been below our immensely high standards at times, sure, but there is a hell of a long way from there to 'dreadful'
Indeed! Or losing at home to 9-man Walsall at the Withdean in the 2008-09 season.Anyone who thinks we were 'dreadful' against AEK hasn't got a frigging clue what they're talking about. We narrowly lost a game we should have won against a good team. We might not have been quite at our best, but we were also hardly 'dreadful' in the first 20 mins against United. I guess you've only just started supporting Brighton. 'Dreadful' is losing 4-0 to Darlington at Gillingham.
Cloning?6 changes for United
7 for AEK
9 for Bournemouth
7 for Chelsea
Last season, a clear strength was the partnerships we had. Mac and Caicedo and Estupinan and Mitoma were notable examples and the latter were reunited to devastating affect at half time on Sunday.
This season we have goalkeepers in rotation and the longest run of games any centre back pairing has had is two.
Is it affecting our performances and if so, what’s the alternative?
We've lost 2 of the last 3 !Well, we keep winning so I’m not sure what the problem is ? How do you not make changes when playing so many matches ?
Bigger picture.We've lost 2 of the last 3 !
5 convincing wins out of 6 would say it’s good squad management and if we want to be fresh at the end of the season to get top 4 we need to do it6 changes for United
7 for AEK
9 for Bournemouth
7 for Chelsea
Last season, a clear strength was the partnerships we had. Mac and Caicedo and Estupinan and Mitoma were notable examples and the latter were reunited to devastating affect at half time on Sunday.
This season we have goalkeepers in rotation and the longest run of games any centre back pairing has had is two.
Is it affecting our performances and if so, what’s the alternative?
I assume it comes from people thinking we should be able to consistently play at our best, with 6 or 7 new first team squad members.Well, we keep winning so I’m not sure what the problem is ? How do you not make changes when playing so many matches ?
Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, no?
This season was always going to be a balancing act - and it's only really just started. There's a long way to go with probably plenty of ups and downs.
Changes or not, I'm sticking to my usual (boring) 'one game at a time' approach and enjoying the ride. and following the tracker, obvs.