Woo hoo! Welcome back!That saved me some typing.
Agree with you BTW.
Woo hoo! Welcome back!That saved me some typing.
It's a posioned chalice though. A few seasons in the PL are fair enough, but unless you don't bother trying to be that competitive (like Watford did a few years ago) you'll end up back in the Championship with an albatross of debt. Things may have changed with regard to TV money, parachute payments etc in the intervening six years, but not a great deal I expect - Charlton were regarded as a model of a well run small PL club but when we went down in 2007 it was with circa 30m of debt. That crippling debt is the reason so many relegated PL clubs (see Leeds, Stains, etc) end up in League 1 a couple of seasons later. Personally I'd prefer just hanging around the Championship rather than the so often seen PL-L1 boom and bust model.
As regards ticket allocation, I suspect we were offered 2,000 sale or return and told if we wanted more we'd have to pay for them up front and our skinflint secret owners weren't prepared to commit to that. Reckon we could have brought up another 500-600 if available, not only because of the new stadium thing but because after SE London and NW Kent, Sussex and SE Kent are our next biggest supporter bases, and for many of those people the Amex is as close (or closer) as The Valley. PS I think even our cheapskate owners would have taken the maximum allocation possible had the game been yesterday as originally scheduled.
No one forces debt on the clubs though. The increased income from TV money should pay for team strengthening and any contracts awarded need to reflect the potential drop in income should a team be relegated.
I can see no excuse for running up huge debts and if a club doesn't have sufficient income to compete (although with TV money they should do) they should cut their cloth accordingly.
Woo hoo! Welcome back!
Agree with you BTW.
In an ideal world that's true, but until there is a proper salary cap in the PL, the reality is that the higher up the pyramid a club is the bigger the debts they accrue are. Man Utd are £360m in debt, Man City lost £98m last season and £197m the season before, etc etc. Albion are over £100m in debt. Yes it's interest free friendly debt not due to be repaid for a decade but £93m for a stadium + £29m for a training complex + the £7-8m a season operating loss quoted by the press is a metric f***tonne of debt in purely literal terms, surely?
In an ideal world that's true, but until there is a proper salary cap in the PL, the reality is that the higher up the pyramid a club is the bigger the debts they accrue are. Man Utd are £360m in debt, Man City lost £98m last season and £197m the season before, etc etc. Albion are over £100m in debt. Yes it's interest free friendly debt not due to be repaid for a decade but £93m for a stadium + £29m for a training complex + the £7-8m a season operating loss quoted by the press is a metric f***tonne of debt in purely literal terms, surely?
So what's the latest crowd estimate then? I was in the ticket office (Queens Rd) earlier, and it was very busy.
I can understand fans of other Clubs looking at our financial spending and thinking we are barking mad, with a bubble that will burst anytime soon.