I love the way people defend the odd misspelling by claiming they are dyslexic. The rest of your posts would suggest otherwise.
For starters, a UEFA A Licence. Then there's the fact that Gus says Charlie is someone he can trust 100 percent, doesn't just tell him what he thinks he wants to hear and is a great coach (Gus's words, not mine). Not bad to be going on with.
Difference between being pedantic, because it is actually E=MC with a small superscript 2, but shortened on a non HTML facility would be E=MC2 as opposed to spelling seems as 'seams'. Good try at belittling though, 3/10.
But a full 10/10 for your belittling of a dyslexic bloke trying to start a discussion. Top work Einstein!
I love the way people defend the odd misspelling by claiming they are dyslexic. The rest of your posts would suggest otherwise.
I love the way people defend the odd misspelling by claiming they are dyslexic. The rest of your posts would suggest otherwise.
You are incredibly narrow minded
Forgive me if this seams a bit nieve, but what qualifies him to be our head coach? (Apart for his obvious commitment to the Albion). That's not to say that that he has done a bad job, quite the opposite, but I wonder how? Has he played at this level before? Is coaching at this level more about leading and organising than teaching technical skills?
Is he likely to be head coach if we go up?
To answer your main question, the way he has done the job so far qualifies him to continue doing it.
Coaching is a lot about leading and organising, and also communication, transmitting what the manager wants, and above all I think being a link between the manager and the players. I think he has great personal skills and rapport with the players and everyone else working at the club.
i doubt gus would have him around if he wasn't up to it...it's not like we'd have much trouble attracting a decent coach to replace him
and even if he hadn't played at this level before (which he has, for us), playing ability has little correlation to coaching ability
he was always a fairly limited player, but from what i've heard his character (to a certain extent) made up for it, and made him important to the team. ...I'd imagine that translates to having around in a non-playing capacity, especially if morale is low. Whether he can manage is another question, but he's clearly adding something, as otherwise he wouldn't be the 3rd most senior member of the coaching staff
To answer your main question, the way he has done the job so far qualifies him to continue doing it.
Coaching is a lot about leading and organising, and also communication, transmitting what the manager wants, and above all I think being a link between the manager and the players. I think he has great personal skills and rapport with the players and everyone else working at the club.
He is actually, but he's just being silly. It seems that people have assumed you were having a dig at Charlie, which I don't think you were.I Bet you're a great guy to meet.
It's right! - I'll get me coteWhether I spell something write or not
i doubt gus would have him around if he wasn't up to it...it's not like we'd have much trouble attracting a decent coach to replace him
and even if he hadn't played at this level before (which he has, for us), playing ability has little correlation to coaching ability
he was always a fairly limited player, but from what i've heard his character (to a certain extent) made up for it, and made him important to the team. ...I'd imagine that translates to having around in a non-playing capacity, especially if morale is low. Whether he can manage is another question, but he's clearly adding something, as otherwise he wouldn't be the 3rd most senior member of the coaching staff
I Bet you're a great guy to meet. You've never even met me.